Comparision of polymerization shrinkage of ten kinds of nanofilled light-cured composite resin

Xiao-min ZHANG,Gang ZHENG,Hong LIN,Yong-xiang XU,Jian-min HAN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2013.s1.027
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To measure the shrinkage of ten kinds of nano-filled light-cured composite resin with a new non-invasive method,and to compare the properities of shrinkage.Methods Ten composite resin (CM:Clearfil Majesty; CX:Ceram · X; F:Fulfil ; E:Estelite α ; PM:Premisa; TN:Tetric N-Ceram restorative; S:Spectrum TPH3; TB:Tetric Bulk Fill; Z:Z350XT; P:P90) were included.The shrinkage of those materials was assessed with a novel set-up based on laser triangulation which was capable of real-time monitoring.The specimens (6.mm × 2 mm × 2 mm) were photopolymerized for 40 s.Total volumetric shrinkage (% S),the maximum shrinkage rate (Smax) and time at maximum rate (tmax) of each material were measured.Statistics analyses were done using the one-way ANOVA and LSD test.Results The volumetric shrinkage (%S) ranged from 1.2% to 3.09%,which were shown in the follow sequence:P < PM < Z ≈ E < TN ≈ CM ≈ TB < CX < S < F.Z and E demonstrated similar shrinkage,and so did TN and CM.Smax ranged from 2.14 to 14.76 μm/s and t~ ranged from 3.29 to 5.39 s.Significant differences in % S,Smax and tmax were found among the ten kinds of materials.Conclusions The composites resin with nano fillers showed advantages in the properties of polymerization shrinkage.The size and volume of nanofillers will affect the polymerization shrinkage.The smaller nanofillers has positive effect on shrinkage reduction of nano-filled composites.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?