A comparative study on adhesive force of cast crown copings cemented to ITI abutments using four glass ionomer cements

Yao Cheng,Baiping Fu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11752/j.kqcl.2014.02.04
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the adhesive force of between ITI regular neck cementable abutments and cast crown copings with four glass ionomer cements. Methods 10 prefabricated cast copings and 10 ITI regular neck cementable abutments were cross-cemented with the following 4 luting ce-ments:a conventional glass ionomer cements as group A (Fuji I, GC, Japan), a resin modified glass ionomer ce-ments as group B (RelyX Luting, 3M ESPE, USA), a provisional glass ionomer cements as group C (Fuji Temp, GC, Japan) and a glass ionomer cements as group D(Ketac Cem Easymix, 3M ESPE, Germany). The cemented specimens were subjected to a debonding test, and then the adhesive force for each specimen was recorded, calcu-lated in Newton and analyzed with SPSS 16.0(n=10,α=0.05). Meanwhile, the fracture mode for each specimen was also recorded. The cast crown copings and the abutments were cleansed and reused. Results Adhesive forces&nbsp;for the 4 luting cements were ranked as follows:C (183.6 ±29.4N)>D(153.4±36.2N)>B(144.4±41.1N)>A (109.9±25.7N). Group C produced the highest adhesive force, while group A exhibited the lowest adhesive force, significantly lower than other three luting cements(P<0.05). The fracture surface observation shows that group A and D fractured at the interface of cement and abutments, while group B and C exhibited as“mixed fracture”mode. Conclusion Both conventional glass ionomer cement and resin-modified glass ionomer cements possessed the clinically acceptable adhesive forces, while the provisional glass ionomer luting cements was not suitable for the provisional cementation of implant crowns due to the too high adhesive force.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?