Comparison of the Stability of Two-Haptic and Four-Haptic Intraocular Lenses in Highly Myopic Eyes

杜钰,何雯雯,卢奕,竺向佳
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20191115-00308
2020-01-01
Abstract:Objective::To compare the stability of two-haptic and four-haptic intraocular lenses (IOL) in high myopic eyes.Methods::In this retrospective case-control study, 148 high myopic patients who received uneventful phacoemulsification with the implantation of a two-haptic IOL (Tecnis ZCB00, AMO) or four-haptic IOL (MC X11 ASP, HumanOptics) during October 2016 to June 2017 at the Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University were selected. Of these, 54 were in the two-haptic IOL group, and 94 in the four-haptic IOL group. Follow-up was planned for six months after surgery, including routine postoperative examinations. An OPD-Scan III aberrometer was used to evaluate the decentration and tilt of the IOL, higher-order aberrations, and modulation transfer function. Comparisons of IOL decentration and tilt, and visual qualities were conducted between the two groups. An independent-sample t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, χ2 test, and Spearman correlation test were used in statistical analyses. Results::No statistically significant difference in terms of age, gender, or best-corrected visual acuity was seen between the two groups. However, significant differences were seen between the decentration of the two-haptic IOL group and the four-haptic IOL group when they were divided into subgroups of axial lengths between 26 mm and <28 mm, and between 28 mm and <30 mm [0.26(0.15, 0.33)mm vs. 0.18(0.10, 0.24)mm, Z=-2.81, P=0.005; (0.42±0.28)mm vs. (0.18±0.07)mm, t=2.96, P=0.01]. Meanwhile, significant correlations were found between decentration and axial length in both the two-haptic IOL group ( r=0.304, P=0.027) and four-haptic IOL group ( r=0.366, P<0.001). Under conditions of a pupil size of 7 mm, better ocular and intraocular higher-order aberrations and coma were seen in the four-haptic IOL group (all P<0.05). Conclusions::For high myopic eyes, the four-haptic IOL seems to be better than the two-haptic IOL in terms of long-term IOL stability and visual quality, especially in low-light conditions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?