Abstract:Background Conventional corticosteroid therapy after laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) is topical application of 0.1％ fluorometholone eye drops for 4 months,but this therapy increases the ocular hypertension risk and leads to poor compliance in patients.It is necessary to explore a safe and effective brachytherapeutic drug.Objective This study was to compare the clinical outcomes between the brachytherapy of 0.5％ loteprednol etabonate eye drops and the long-term therapy of 0.1％ fluorometholone eye drops after LASEK.Methods Clinical data were retrospectively analyzed from 208 right eyes in 208 mild and moderate myopia patients who received LASEK at Peking University Third Hospital from 2009 to 2013.The eye drops of 0.5％ loteprednol etabonate was used 6 times daily since operation day until postoperative day 5,and 4 times daily for a week,and then tapered for three consecutive weeks in 104 eyes of the loteprednol group after LASEK,and 0.1％ fluorometholone eye drops was applied topically 4 times daily for initial one month and then tapered for three consecutive months in another 104 eyes in the fluorometholone group after LASEK.Corneal epithelial healing time was compared between the two groups by recording the wearing duration of corneal contact lens.Noncontact intraocular pressure (lOP) was detected and corrected 5 days,2 weeks,1 month and 3,6 months after LASEK.Haze was scored based on the criteria of Cheng under the slit lamp microscope and apparently optometry was performed 1 month and 3,6 months after LASEK.Results The number of eyes removed corneal contact lens in 5,6 and 7 days after LASEK was not significantly different between the loteprednol group and the fluorometholone group (x2 =1.180,P =0.554).No considerable differences were seen in the eye numbers with the equivalent spherical lens (absolute value) ≤0.5 D in 1 month,3months and 6 months after LASEK (Z=-1.028,P=0.304;Z=-0.398,P=0.691;Z=-0.445,P=0.656).In the fifth days after surgery,the median corrected IOP was 13.52 mmHg and 13.12 mmHg in the loteprednol group and the fluorometholone group,respectively,showing a significant difference between them (Z =-1.985,P =0.047),but no significant differences were found in IOP in 2 weeks,1 month and 3 months,6 months after surgery between the two groups (all at P＞0.05).IOP elevated (postoperative IOP-preoperative IOP ≥ 5 mmHg) after LASEK in 5 eyes in the loteprednol group and 4 eyes in the fluorometholone group (x2 =0.116,P =0.733).In 1 month after surgery,the number of eyes in different grades of haze was significantly decreased in the loteprednol group compared with the fluorometholone group (x2=13.506,P=0.009),however,there was no significant differences in haze grading in postoperative 3 months and 6 months between the two groups (x2 =2.199,P =0.699;x2 =1.154,P =0.562).Conclusions Brachytherapy of 0.5％ loteprednol etabonate eye drops appears to have a similar effect in antiinflammation and inhibition of haze to the long-term therapy of 0.1％ fluorometholone eye drops after LASEK.Furthermore,topical application of 0.5％ loteprednol etabonate eye drops dose not increase the risk of ocular hypertension.

Clinical observation of partial using of 0.1％ bromfenac sodium after laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis in low and medium myopia

Changes of dry eye parameters after femtosecond laser and conventional LASIK

Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond-Assisted Laser in Situ Keratomileusis in Patients with Deep Corneal Opacity: Case Series.

[Mutiple Factors Analysis of the Effects of Excimer Laser Photorefractive Keratectomy].

Clinical Comparison Between Brachytherapy of 0.5 ％ Loteprednol Etabonate Eye Drops and Long-Term Therapy of 0.1％ Fluorometholone Eye Drops after LASEK

Efficacy Observation of 0.1％ Bromfenac Sodium Eye Drops on Relieving the Post-Lasek Irritative Symptoms

Clinical investigation on contrast sensitivity and higher order aberration after Q-factor guided SBK and LASIK for myopia

Changes of contrast visual acuity under photopic environment following excimer laser corneal refractive surgery

Comparison of long term effects of laser subepithelial keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis on high myopia correction

[Comparison of Laser in Situ Keratomileusis and Laser-Assisted Subepithelial Keratectomy for Myopia More Than -10.00 Diopters].

The Effect of Intraoperative Mitomycin C on Refractive Stability after Laser-Assisted Subepithelial Keratomileusis in Treating High Myopia

Laser subepithelial keratomileusis for treatment of myopia and astigmatism

Comparison on biomechanical stability between femtosecond laser assisted LASIK and LASEK with ocular response analyzer

Clinical Assessment of Proanoprefen Eyedrops on Postoperative Inflammation from LASEK

The influence of femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK and LASEK on ocular surface

Changes in the Posterior Corneal Surface after Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Lenticule Intrastromal Keratoplasty (LIKE) Performed into a Pocket (SMI-LIKE) or under a Flap (FS-LIKE)

[Efficacy of small incision lenticule extraction combined with femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis for optimized monovision correction in myopia patients with presbyopia]

Effect of 3% Diquafosol Sodium on Dry Eye After Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Surgery in High-Myopic Eyes

Transient change in the binocular visual function after femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis for myopia patients

Long-term Visual Quality after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) and Laser Assisted Subepithelial Keratomileusis (LASEK) for Low Myopia

The Pharmaceutical Prevetion of Diffuse Lamellar Keratitis after LASIK