Abstract:Background: Apical root resorption has been identified as a potential risk/adverse effect of conventional orthodontic treatment, however, with changing dental demand and increasing patient preference for clear aligners therapy, the availability of evidence-based information on its incidence/severity following treatment with either clear aligners or fixed appliance is of relevance to clinical practice in providing guidance on orthodontic treatment risk to patients and therefore contributing to the process of obtaining valid informed consent. Objectives: The aim of this study is to undertake a literature review to establish whether apical root resorption following orthodontic treatment is greater in adult patients treated with clear aligners as compared to conventional fixed appliances, to analyse and appraise the data, to make appropriate recommendations relevant to orthodontic practice and is widely referenced by orthodontists. Search Methods: A systematic literature search of three databases (Medline, Embase, Web of science), Google scholar and a hand search of relevant journals was done. Selection Criteria: Primary research studies high in the hierarchy of evidence that investigated/compared apical root resorption following extraction/non-extraction based orthodontic treatment with fixed appliance or clear aligners in adult patients equal to or greater than 18 years between January 2010 and December 2021 were selected for this systematic review. Data Collection and Analysis: Studies were accessed, duplicates eliminated, data extracted with the use of a customized data extraction form, and quality assessed using a critical appraisals skills programme tool. Results: A total of 67 studies were identified, and after the elimination of duplicates and quality assessment, six studies were selected for review. The Cochrane Rob 2 bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias of the selected studies. Apical root resorption prevalence/severity was measured using two different radiographic methods: 3-Dimesional (CBCT-scan) and 2-Dimensional (panoramic/periapical radiographs). Conclusions: The majority of the studies showed that the severity/prevalence of apical root resorption is less in clear aligners compared to fixed appliance treated patients, however, they are characterized by different baseline malocclusion/treatment duration/modalities, study design flaw, inconsistency in outcome measurement/calculation. Due to these limitations, it is difficult to arrive at a conclusion and make recommendations applicable to everyday clinical practice. The clinician should take into consideration factors that increase the risk of apical root resorption such as genetic predisposition, treatment duration, force application (types and location), types of tooth movement, initial malocclusion and extraction/ non-extraction-based treatment in deciding on the orthodontic treatment option and gaining patient consent.Limitations: The current evidence has a number of limitations including the lack of robust prospective studies on apical root resorption, different methods of outcome measurement and calculation, different baseline malocclusions, the evaluation of apical root resorption in only one treatment modality and short treatment duration which may influence the validity of the study conclusions. A meta-analysis could not be performed due to the heterogeneous outcome recording methods. Further research is recommended

Comparison of the extent of orthodontically induced root resorption inroot-filled and vital pulp teeth: a meta-analysis

In vitro measurement accuracy of an electronic apex locator in primary teeth with and without root resorption

Evaluation of Root Resorption after Comprehensive Orthodontic Treatment Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT): a Meta-Analysis

Orthodontically induced external apical root resorption considerations of root-filled teeth vs vital pulp teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Effect of Orthodontic Treatment on Root Shape in Endodontically Treated Teeth

Effects of Orthodontic Mechanics on Root Resorption: A Comparative Study

Is Apical Root Resorption Greater When Using Clear Aligners as Compared to Conventional Fixed Appliances in Adult Patients Following Orthodontic Treatment? A literature Review

Comparative assessment of vertical fracture resistance in endodontically treated roots with different obturating systems and techniques: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of in vitro studies

Comparative Study of Root Canal Morphology of Mandibular Incisors by Cone-Beam CT and Canal Staining and Clearing Technique

Three-dimensional root resorption evaluation of maxillary anterior teeth in skeletal class Ⅲ patients: a cone beam computed tomography study

Assessment of the canal fillings using cone beam computed tomography and digital periapical radiography

Endodontic outcome predictors identified with periapical radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography scans.

[Evaluation of Root Resorption after Surgical Orthodontic Treatment of Skeletal Class Ⅲ Malocclusion by Three-Dimensional Volumetric Measurement with Cone-Beam CT].

Comparison of Root Canal Morphology of Mandibular Incisors with Cone-beam Computed Tomography and RVG

Effects of root filling quality and coronal restoration methods on periapical status of endodontically treated teeth

Effectiveness analysis of augulated periapical radiography and micro-endodontics in the detection and treatment of missing root canals

Effects of iRoot SP and AH Plus paste used in root canal treatment: a Meta-analysis

[A Factors Study of Root Resorption after Orthodontic Treatment].

[A retrospective study on incisor root resorption in patients treated with bracketless invisible appliance and straight wire appliance]

Root resorption before and after orthodontic treatment: a clinical study of contributory factors.

[Effect of root development on the root and periodontal absorptions of maxillary impacted anterior teeth after orthodontic traction]