Three-dimensional root resorption evaluation of maxillary anterior teeth in skeletal class Ⅲ patients: a cone beam computed tomography study

吕航苗,高娟,马慧敏,李小彤
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115797-20200407-20303
2020-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To investigate root resorption of maxillary anterior teeth in skeletal class Ⅲ patients using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) three-dimensional reconstructed images.Methods:The samples consisted of 25 skeletal class Ⅲ patients who went through orthodontic-surgical treatment. CBCT data of each patient at T0 (pretreatment), T1(preoperative), T2(posttreatment) were acquired and 3D digital root models were reconstructed. Root length and segmented root volumes(whole root, cervical part and apical part) of maxillary central incisors and canines were calculated to investigate the characteristics of root resorption between different teeth positions during the orthodontic-surgical treatment.Results:(1) Maxillary central incisors exhibited significant decrease of root length and volume in presurgical stage (T0 to T1) and postsurgical stage (T1 to T2 )( P=0.000), Maxillary canines showed significant root length decrease during presurgical stage (T0 to T1) while apparent volume resorption happened during postsurgical stage (T1 to T2)( P=0.000). (2) Maxillary central incisors and canines showed less volume resorption in cervical root than apical root. The ratio of the mean amount of volume change were about 1: 2; (3) From stage T0 to T2, the changing amount of root volume showed no difference between maxillary central incisors and canines (maxillary central incisor (21.26±13.33) mm 3, maxillary canine (20.02±10.75) mm 3), but maxillary central incisors had greater proportion of changing amount (13.10±7.65%) than maxillary canines (8.91±4.88%) ( P=0.031). Conclusions:During the course of orthodontic-surgical treatment of skeletal class Ⅲ patients, maxillary central incisors and canines showed apparent root length decrease and volume resorption, and cervical root resorption could not be ignored. Maxillary central incisors resorb worse than canines. The volume measurement provides a new sensitive way to explore root resorption.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?