Comparative Study of Plastic Surgery for Mitral Valve and Biogenic Valve Replacement on Left Ventricular Structure and Function

Zhaohuan Li,Yan Deng,Chunmei Li,Mingliang Zuo,Anguo Luo,Shan Wang,Mingchen Xiong,Lixue Yin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-4931.2017.17.017

2017-01-01

Abstract:Objective To compare the different effect of the plastic surgery for mitral valve and biological valve replacement on left ventricular structure and function. Methods Totally 50 patients with mitral valve regurgitation admitted to Taiwan Zhenxing Hospital were selected, 18 patients underwent plastic surgery for mitral valve ( Plastic group ) and 32 patients underwent biological valve replace-ment ( replacement group ) . Thoracic echocardiography before and after the operation were executed. The aortic root diameter ( AO ) , left a-trial diameter ( LA ) , left ventricular end-diastolic diameter ( LVEDD ) , left ventricular end-systolic diameter ( LVESD ) and left ventricu-lar ejection fraction ( LVEF ) ( simpson method was adopted ) were measured, and the quantity of mitral valve regurgitation was as-sessed. The differences of the changes before and after surgery between the two groups were compared. Results After operation, the LA and LVEDD of the two groups were reduced, and the reduction degree of the plastic group was more obvious than that of the replace-ment group ( P < 0. 05 ) . In early post-operation ( in the 1st month ) , the LVESD became smaller in the plastic group, while it was ex-panded slightly in the replacement group, the difference between the two groups was significant ( P < 0. 05 ) . Meanwhile, the LVEF in the plastic group increased in the early post-operation but reduced in the replacement group, the difference between the two groups was significant ( P < 0. 05 ) . In the follow-up, 1 case of moderate regurgitation ( 5. 56％ ) , 9 cases of mild regurgitation ( 50. 00％ ) and 8 cases of no obvious regurgitation ( 44. 44％) were showed in the plastic group, while no moderate or severe regurgitation ( 0 ) , 8 cases of mild regurgitation ( 25. 00％) and 24 cases of no obvious regurgitation ( 75. 00％) in replacement group, the difference between the two groups was not significant ( P=0. 062 ) . Conclusion Plastic surgery for mitral valve is better in the reversion of left ventricular structure and the early improvement of left ventricular function than the biological valve replacement. As for radical treatment for mitral regurgita-tion, the biological valve replacement seems to be slightly better than the plastic surgery for mitral valve.