The Effects of Mitral Valve Replacement with or Without Preservation of Subvalvular Apparatus on Postoperative Left Ventricular Function

Xh Shu,Cz Pan,Xd Shen,A Yu,Gq Huang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(01)99551-8
IF: 24
2001-01-01
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Abstract:Objective To study the effects of mitral valve replacement (MVR) with or without preservation of subvalvular apparatus on left ventricular function.Methods Thirty patients with chronic mitral regurgitation were classified into three groups. Twelve patients underwent conventional MVR (group A), 10 patients had MVR with preservation of posterior chordae tendineae only (group B), and 8 patients had MVR with preservation of both anterior and posterior chordae tendineae (group C). HP Sonos 2500 imaging system with automated border detection (ABD) technique was used to evaluate left ventricular end diastolic volume index (EDVI), end systolic volume index (ESVI), ejection fraction (EF), peak ejection rate (PER), peak fraction rate (PFR) and time of peak fraction rate (TPFR) before and three months after surgery.Results ①There were no significant difference of HR, BP or all ABD parameters among three groups before surgery (P 0.05 ). ②After three months of surgery, EDVI was significantly greater in group A (P 0.05 ), and lower in both group B and C (P 0.05 ), ESVI was not changed in group A and decreased significantly in group B and C (P 0.05 ). PER was not significantly different in group A and B and increased significantly in group C (P 0.05 ),and EF was not significantly changed in group A and B, but improved in group C (P 0.05 ). ③No significant difference in PFR or TPFR was found in group A or group B compared to those before surgery. However, TPFR was shorter in group C.Conclusions Conventional MVR may harm left ventricular systolic and diastolic function. MVR with preservation of both anterior and posterior chordae tendineae has more beneficial effect in maintaining or improving postoperative left ventricular systolic and diastolic function compared to MVR with preservation of posterior chordae tendineae only.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?