Abstract:Background: The control of the microbial contamination of pharmaceutical products (PP) is crucial to ensure their safety and efficacy. The validity of the monitoring of such contamination depends on the uncertainty of this quantification. Highly uncertain quantifications due to the variability of determinations or the magnitude of systematic effects affecting microbial growth or other analytical operations make analysis unfit for the intended use. The quantification of the measurement uncertainty expressing the combined effects of all random and systematic effects affecting the analysis allows for a sound decision about quantification adequacy for their intended use. The complexity of the quantification of microbial analysis uncertainty led to the development of simplified ways of performing this evaluation. Objective: This work assesses the adequacy of the simplified quantification of the uncertainty of the determination of the microbial contamination of PP by log transforming microbial count and dilution factor of the test sample whose uncertainty is combined in a log scale using the uncertainty propagation law. Methods: This assessment is performed by a parallel novel bottom-up and accurate evaluation of microbial analysis uncertainty involving the Monte Carlo method simulation of the Poisson log-normal distribution of counts and of the normally distributed measured volumes involved in the analysis. Systematic effects are assessed and corrected on results to compensate for their impact on the determinations. Poisson regression is used to predict precision affecting determinations on unknown test samples. Result: Simplified and detailed models of the uncertainty of the measurement of the microbial contamination of PP are provided, allowing objective comparisons of several determinations and those with a maximum contamination level. Conclusions: This work concludes that triplicate determinations are required to produce results with adequately low uncertainty and that simplified uncertainty quantification underevaluates or overevaluates the uncertainty from determinations based on low or high colony numbers, respectively. Therefore, detailed uncertainty evaluations are advised for determinations between 50 and 200% of PP's maximum admissible contamination value. Highlight: User-friendly tools for detailed and simplified evaluations of the uncertainty of the measurement of microbial contamination of PP are provided together with the understanding of when simplifications are adequate.

Evaluation of Uncertainty of pH Measurement in Pharmaceuticals by Monte Carlo Method

Uncertainty evaluation of determination of emamectin benzoate residues in the water bamboo by high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

Measurement uncertainty for Dissolution tests using Monte Carlo methods – Uncertainties arising from sampling and analytical steps

Measurement Uncertainty Calculations for pH Value Obtained by an Ion-Selective Electrode

On a Monte Carlo method for measurement uncertainty evaluation and its implementation

Application of Monte Carlo Method in the Measurement Process Design According to Next Generation of Gps

Application of the adaptive Monte Carlo method for uncertainty evaluation in the determination of total testosterone in human serum by triple isotope dilution mass spectrometry

Monte Carlo uncertainty estimation for wavelength calibration

Use of the Monte Carlo method for the estimation of measurement uncertainty in chemical analysis systems with intensive mathematical treatment

Simplified and Detailed Evaluations of the Uncertainty of the Measurement of Microbiological Contamination of Pharmaceutical Products

The use of a Monte Carlo method for uncertainty calculation, with an application to the measurement of neutron ambient dose equivalent rate

Getting started with uncertainty evaluation using the Monte Carlo method in R

Multivariate guard-bands and total risk assessment on multiparameter evaluations with correlated and uncorrelated measured values

Study on the Evaluating Method and the Affecting Factors of Measurement Uncertainty for the Determination of Marker Compounds in Chinese Materia Medica

Mathematical modeling applied to the uncertainty analysis of a tank prover calibration: Understanding the influence of calibration conditions on the GUM validation using the Monte Carlo method

Monte Carlo uncertainty quantification method of pneumatic measurement tube frequency response

Comparison of MCM and GUM Method for Evaluating Measurement Uncertainty of Wind Speed by Pitot Tube

High precision weighing and uncertainty assessment in reagent preparation

Comparison of Monte Carlo Simulation, Least Square Fitting and Calibration Factor Methods for the Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty Using Direct Pressure Indicating Devices

A self-adaptive method for the assessment of dynamic measurement uncertainty

Method for Measurement Uncertainty Evaluation of Cylindricity Error Based on Good Point Set