Comparison of Three Different Sources of Data of Adverse Drug Reactions

Rui Niu,Ying Liu,Yufang Xiang,Jiadong Guo,Bianling Feng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19960/j.cnki.issn1005-0698.2018.02.006
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To find the appropriate method to comprehensive evaluate post-marketing drug safety.We compare the frequencies of ADR of fluorouracil and capecitabine from three separate datasets:the Meta-analysis of RCT,reports published in medical journals and the spontaneous reports sent to the state food and drug administration ADR monitoring center.Methods:Choose the top five ADR phenomenon of capecitabine and fluorouracil from three separate datasets.By calculating the relative value of ADR frequency to compare the frequencies of ADR of these three separate datasets.Results:For both drugs,the top five ADR phenomenon from three separate datasets are inconsistent,the order are different,and the same ADR phenomenon has different value.For capecitabine,the highest frequency of ADR phenomenon are different:it is the brotherhood of syndrome in the Meta-analysis;it is bone marrow suppression in case reports;it is nausea and vomiting in spontaneous ADR reports.For fluorouracil,all the highest frequency of ADR phenomenon are nausea and vomiting,but the relative value are different.Conclusion:Three separate datasets could provide different ADR information,so we should choose the suitable method to analyze these datasets.Integrate many kinds of information and complete each other to obtain comprehensive and reliable drug safety evaluation results.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?