Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms
Chang LIU,Zhi-Min XUE,Zhe-Ning LIU,Wei-xiang TAN,Yu WANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2014.02.005
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms( SIRS-CV). Methods: In simulation design,40 patients w ith schizophrenia,mood disorder,and other psychiatric disorders,80 normal college students[honest group( n = 40) and simulators( n = 40) ], and in know n-group design,100 patients in a forensic clinic[suspected malingering group( n = 20) and non-malingering group( n = 80) ]w ere investigated w ith the SIRS-CV. Eighty normal college students w ere also assessed w ith the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2( MMPI-2). The consistency of the scale w as tested by using correlation analysis and Cronbach' s α coefficient. The criterion w as the three validity scales[Lie( L),Infrequency( F), Correction( K) ]of the MMPI-2. The score of the Chinese version of SIRS difference in different groups w as used to test the validate validity. Results: The Cronbach α coefficient w ere 0. 66- 0. 98. There w as significant positive correlation betw een the subscales( r = 0. 47- 0. 85,P 0. 05). The malingering dimension( including 8 factor) scores of SIRS-CV w ere positively correlated w ith the F scores of MMPI-2( r = 0. 33- 0. 48,Ps 0. 05),and negatively correlated w ith the L and K scores of MMPI-2( r =- 0. 23-- 0. 52,P 0. 05). In addition to the direct appraisal of honesty, defensive symptoms, overly specific symptoms of these three factors, the 10 factor scores of SIRS-CV in the analogue group w ere higher than normal group and general psychiatric patient groups[i. e., rare symptoms,( 10. 2 ± 3. 3) vs.( 0. 7 ± 1. 3),( 2. 4 ± 1. 9),P 0. 05) ]. The scale factor scores of SIRS-CV in the suspected malingering group scores w ere higher than those in the malingering group[i. e., rare symptoms,( 7. 4 ± 1. 7) vs.( 2. 8 ± 2. 6),P 0. 05) ]. The sensitivity in simulation design and know n-group design w ere 20% and 85%,and the specificity w ere 83. 75% and 87. 5%,respectively. Conclusion: The Chinese version of the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms is a reliable and valid measure for identification of malingering in actual w ork.