Abstract:Background:The hyperextension injury of the cervical spine is a common injury, which usually leads to cervi-cal intervertebral disc rupture and may result in cervical instability and other secondary lesions. Early, timely and accurate diagnosis will contribute to good clinical outcomes of treatment and recovery. Objective: To evaluate the reliability and agreement of the characteristic findings on X-Ray, CT and MRI examinations for the diagnosis of cervical intervertebral disc injury. Methods:A total of 44 patients who had hyperextension injury of the cervical spine and underwent anterior ap-proach operations between November 2013 and July 2016 were included in this study. Each of these patients had complete documentations of preoperative images including X-ray, CT and MRI, but no apparent evidence of vertebral fractures or dis-locations. Characteristic findings were defined as diagnostic criteria for cervical intervertebral disc injury. The imaging doc-umentations were read by three physicians separately, and the diagnosis was compared with intraoperative findings. Inter-ob-server agreement for each assessment was determined using the Kappa statistic. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, posi-tive and negative predictive values of different image features in detecting cervical disc injury were calculated. The intraop-erative findings were used as the gold standard. Results:The reliability and inter-observer agreement of each diagnostic cri-terion in X-Ray and CT for the assessment of cervical disc injury were lower than those in MRI. Thickening of the soft tis-sue anterior to the vertebral body had both high specificity (89.6%-94.8%) and accuracy (80.6%-83.9%) in assessment of the cervical disc injury. Inter-observer agreement of discontinuity on sagittal T1–weighted image (T1D) for the assessment of cervical disc injury was fair (Kappa value was 0.217, 0.267 and 0.318) , and its sensitivity (43.8%-63.5%) and positive predictive value (25.9%-33.3%) were relatively low. For longitudinal high signal intensity on sagittal T2–weighted image (T2L), the inter-observer agreement was moderate (Kappa value was 0.490, 0.439 and 0.420), and its sensitivity (68.8%-75.0%) and positive predictive value (35.5%-42.4%) were higher than those in T1D. However, the inter-observer agreement of transversal high or intermediate signal intensity on sagittal T2-weighted image (T2T) for the assessment of cervical disc injury was good (Kappa value was 0.669, 0.656 and 0.614), and its sensitivity (81.3%-87.5%), specificity (93.5%-96.1%), accuracy (92.4%-93.5%), positive predictive value (73.7%-81.3%) and negative predictive value (96.0%-97.3%) were all high. Conclusions:When thickening of the soft tissue anterior to the vertebral body is noted in X-Ray and CT images, cervi-cal disc injury may be highly suspected. T2T of MRI is a reliable indicator for cervical disc injury. MRI seems to be more predictable than X-Ray and CT in excluding the cervical disc injury, but this advantage was not statistically significant.

Diagnosis and Therapy of Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy by Dynamic Oblique X-ray

The Role of Digital X-Ray in Curative Effect and Nursing Evaluation of Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy

Effect of cervical kinematic MRI in diagnosis and treatment of cervical spondylosis

K-line tilt: A novel potential predictive indicator for the effectiveness of conservative cervical spondylotic radiculopathy management

A Natural-Position X-Ray for Evaluating Cervical Vertebra Physiology Curvature Before and after Conservative Treatment.

Comparison of Sagittal Spinal Alignment on Standing Plain X-Rays and Supine MRI in Degenerative Lumbar Disease.

The Measurement of Radiographs of Cervical Spine Instability of Sympathetic Cervical Spondylosis

Diagnostic Value of the Nerve Root Sedimentation Sign for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Comparison Study of MRI and X-ray Film in 150 Cases of Scoliosis

Study on the Prescription of Acupuncture in the Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy Based on Computer Vision Image Analysis

The value of kinematic magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of cervical disc herniation

Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of measures of cervical sagittal rotation

Accuracy and Reliability of X-ray Measurements in the Cervical Spine

Difference of cervical neutral position sagittal alignment between protract chin position and natural position cervical lateral X-ray of patients with cervical degenerative disease

Characterization of Clinical Symptoms of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Based on DKI Imaging Parameter Ratios

Reliability and agreement of the diagnosis criteria for cervical intervertebral disc injury based on the manifestations of X-Ray, CT and MRI examinations

Evaluation of Dynamic Foraminal Stenosis with Positional MRI in Patients with C6 Radiculopathy-Mimicking Pain: A Prospective Radiologic Cohort Study

Interrater Reliability and Radiation Dosage of Oblique Coronal Computed Tomography for Sacroiliitis in Comparison with Axial Computed Tomography

MRI to Measure Cervical Sagittal Parameters: a Comparison with Plain Radiographs.

An Analysis of Radiographic Parameters Comparison Between Lumbar Spine Latericumbent and Full-Length Lateral Standing Radiographs

Measurements for rotational deformity in scoliosis and correlation among different mothods