Comparison oflocking plate internal fixation with external fixator intreatment of C1 -type distal radius fractures in elderly pa-tients

徐磊,王叙进,方诗元,孙建皖,杨家赵,李黎,李蒙,刘雷

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2017.11.015

2017-01-01

Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical effects of locking plate internal fixation with external fixator in the treatment of tho -seelderly patients with C1 -type distal radius fractures.Methods A total of 80 elderly patients with C1 -type distal radius fractures,ever treatedin our hospital from Jul 2012 to Dec 2015, were chosen as the study objectsandthen were divided into the study group and the control group in accordance with random number table , 40 patients in each group.Patients in the control group underwentinternal fixation with volar locking plates,while those in the study group were treated with external fixators ,and after operation all patients were followed up for 6 months. The intraoperative bleeding volume, operation timeand hospitalization time, together with state of fracture reduction and complicationsdur -ingthe follow -upperiod, were recordedand comparedbetween thetwo groups .Results The intraoperative bleeding volume , operation time and total hospitalization time in the study group were (45.38 ±5.91)mL, (23.28 ±2.94) min and (6.27 ±0.84) d, respectively, which were significantly less than thosein the control group [(76.19 ±8.34) mL, (60.15 ±6.84) min and (10.63 ±1.86) d;allP <0.05]. There was no significant difference in the state ofwrist jointfunction and fracture reduction at 6 monthsafter operationbetween the two groups (P>0.05), so was difference inthe incidence of complications between them (P >0.05).Conclusion Application of external fixator in the treatment of elderly patients withC1 -type distal radius fracturesshows similar clinical effectsto locking plate internal fixation ,but it could re-duce the patients'intraoperative blood loss andshorten theiroperation and hospitalizationtime , with certain advantages inclinical application .