Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis with locking TCP versus dynamic condylar screw in the internal fixation of comminuted fracture of the distal femur

Zhang Ying,Qiu Chui-ming,Jia Bing-shen,Zhou Jian-qiang,Li Jun,Tan Hai-tao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-8225.2011.22.012
2011-01-01
Abstract:BACKGROUND:There are many therapies for comminuted fracture of the distal femur,but no uniform standard for clinicians is considered to choose appropriate therapy.OBJECTIVE:To compare the effects of minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis(MIPPO) with locking TCP versus dynamic condylar screw(DCS) in the internal fixation of comminuted fracture of the distal femur.METHODS:Thirty-seven patients with comminuted fracture of the distal femur were randomized into two groups:MIPPO with locking TCP group(n=19) and DCS group(n=18).General conditions,damages,healing time,complications and function recovery were compared and analyzed between the two groups.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:The patients undergoing MIPPO with locking TCP could walk earlier,recovered better and had a shorter healing time(P < 0.05).According to Karlstorm Knee Functional Evaluation Standard,the excellent and good rate in the MIPPO with locking TCP was significantly higher than that in the DCS group(P < 0.05).Locking TCP combined with MIPPO technology was better than DCS in treating comminuted fracture of the distal femur.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?