[Comparative Study of Distal Radial Fractures in the Elderly Treated with Locking and Non-Locking Plates].

Jian-hai Chen,Bao-guo Jiang,Dian-ying Zhang,Zhong-guo Fu,Tian-bing Wang,Hai-lin Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:0529-5815.2008.06.013
2008-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the clinical difference of locking and non-locking plates in the treatment of distal radial fractures in the elderly.METHODS:Forty-nine patients with an average age of 68 years were included. The mean follow-up was 30 months. Five cases were traffic related injury, and others were simple falls. Fractures were classified according to AO classification system: 9 cases of A3, 4 cases of B, 11 cases of C1, 18 cases of C2, 7 cases of C3. Patients were grouped as locking group (29 cases) and non-locking group (20 cases).RESULTS:Significant difference was not found between the two groups in active range of motion, Gartland and Werley score, radiological measurements and score.CONCLUSION:Locking and non-locking plates have the same clinical outcome in the treatment of distal radial fractures in the elderly.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?