Dexmedetomidine mixed with low concentration of Ropivacaine in transversus abdominis plane block is safe and effective

Yi Hong,Chen Xiao-le,Huang Dong-sheng,Zhou Da-chun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-8982.2018.10.012
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant mixed with low concentration of Ropivacaine in transversus abdominis plane block in order to reduce the dose and the toxicity of the local anesthetics. Methods Sixty patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical study. The patients were randomly allocated to three groups (20 in each) and underwent bilateral transversus abdominis plane block under ultrasound guidance after surgery with 30 ml of different local anesthetic compounds: 0.19% Ropivacaine and saline in group 19R, 0.19% Ropivacaine plus 50 μg Dexmedetomidine in group 19RD and 0.25% Ropivacaine with saline in group 25R. Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) with Sufentanil was provided to all the patients. The pain score of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at rest and at cough, and Ramsay sedation score were evaluated at 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 h after operation. The time from the end of surgery to the first demand of PCIA, the total demand and delivery of Sufentanil within 24 h after operation were recorded. The patient satisfaction and the adverse reactions were also recorded. Results Ramsay sedation scores of the three groups at different time points were not significantly different (P > 0.05). Comparing to the group 25R, VAS score at rest was significantly higher at 2, 4, 8 and 12 h after surgery in the group 19R (P < 0.05), and VAS score during coughing was higher at 2, 4 and 8 h after surgery in the group 19R (P < 0.05). The time from the end of surgery to the first PCIA demand after surgery was significantly shorter in the group 19R comparing to that in the group 25R [(16.9 ± 13.1) h vs. (26.1 ± 15.5) h, P < 0.05]. The consumption of Sufentanil within 24 h after operation, PCIA administration times and demand in the group 19R were all significantly higher than those in the group 25R (P < 0.05). But comparing these between the group 19RD and the group 25R, there were no significant differences (P > 0.05). The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was not significantly different among the three groups. There were no complications associated to transversus abdominis plane block or local anesthetic toxicity in any group. Conclusions Mixed with 50 μg Dexmedetomidine, low concentration (0.19%) of Ropivacaine provides as effective block as 0.25% Ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block, and might reduce the risk of toxicity of Ropivacaine by reducing its dose for post-operative analgesia in patients receiving laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?