Effect of Dexmedetomidine As an Adjuvant to Ropivacaine for Wound Infiltration in Patients Undergoing Open Gastrectomy A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Hengfei Luan,Pin Zhu,Xiaobao Zhang,Liang Tian,Jiying Feng,Yong Wu,Yongxin Yan,Zhibin Zhao,Xiaoping Gu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000007950
IF: 1.6
2017-01-01
Medicine
Abstract:Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to investigate whether dexmedetomidine could potentiate the analgesic efficacy of ropivacaine, when added to ropivacaine for wound infiltration in patients undergoing open gastrectomy. Methods: Fifty patients scheduled for open gastrectomy were divided into 2 equal groups that were received wound infiltration using 20mL 0.3% ropivacaine plus 2mL normal saline (group R) or 20mL 0.3% ropivacaine plus 2mL 1.0 mu g/kg dexmedetomidine (group DR). Visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump press number, sufentanil consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and wound healing score were recorded. Results: The VAS pain score were comparable between the 2 groups at the observation time points (P>.05), PCA pump press number and sufentanil consumption were higher in group R than that in group DR at 0 to 2, 2 to 4, 4 to 6 time intervals (P<.05) except for 6 to 8, 8 to 10, 10 to 12 time intervals (P>.05), meanwhile, the 24hours total sufentanil consumption was also higher in group R than that in group DR (90.4 +/- 20.5 vs 79.2 +/- 9.4) (P<.05), there were no significant differences in PONV and wound healing score between the 2 groups (P>.05). Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine for wound infiltration promoted the analgesic efficacy of ropivacaine, reduced sufentanil consumption, and had no effect on wound healing; it could be as an ideal adjuvant which could potentiate the analgesic efficacy of local anesthetics.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?