Analgesic effects of intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine combined with local infiltration of ropivacaine in patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery

Xiao-ping XIA,Bei-bei ZHU,Ying LIANG,Zheng-liang MA,Ke HAN,Xiang-hong ZHU,Xiao-qiu TANG

2014-01-01

Abstract:Objective To observe analgesic effects of intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine combined with local infiltration of ropivacaine in patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.Methods Eighty female patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery were divided into four groups equally and randomly.The patients in group D were treated with dexmedetomidine intravenously(n=20),the patients in group R were treated with local infiltration of 0.5%ropivacaine(n=20),the patients in group DR were treated with dexmedetomidine intravenously and local infiltration of 0.5%ropivacaine(n=20),and the patients in group C(control group)did not receive dexmedetomidine or ropivacaine(n=20).The postoperative recovery time,endotracheal extubation time,and first anal exhaust time of the patients were recorded.The postoperative VAS was recorded at the time point of admission to PACU and 6,12,and 24 hafter operation.If the VAS score of the patients was over 6,50 mg pethidine was used and the number of patients who used pethidine was recorded.The postoperative incidence of adverse effects were recorded and patients'comfort was evaluated by Bruggrmann comfort scale(BCS)after the first postoperative 24 h.Results There was no significant difference in the recovery time and extubation time among the four groups.The first anal exhaust time of was shorter in the group DR than in the group C(P0.05).Compared with the group C,the VAS score in the group DR was significantly lower at admission to PACU and 6,12,and 24 hafter operation(P0.05),and the VAS score in the groups R and D was lower at admission to PACU and6 hafter operation(P0.05).There were 8patients in group C,but none in the other three groups,who used pethidine.Compared with the DR group,BCS score of four cases decreased significantly at24 hafter operation in the groups R,D,and C(P0.05).Nine patients in the group C,3in the group R,2in the group D,but none in the DR group presented nausea and vomiting.In addition,1patient in the group C experienced emergence agitation.Conclusion The combination of dexmedetomidine and ropivacaine provides a better and longer analgesic effect for patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery than dexmedetomidine or ropivacaine used alone.