The Effect and Prognosis of Dimen sional Conformal Radiation Therapy for 1348 Cases Esophageal Carcinoma

张安度,孔洁,刘丽虹,王澜,张钧,韩春
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16252/j.cnki.issn1004-0501-2015.06.004
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective To summarize the outcomes and prognositic factors of esophageal cancer patients treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. Methods 1349 patients with esophageal cancer received three dimensional conformal radiotherapy (980 cases with 3DCRT, 369 with IMRT) in our hospital from 2003 to 2012. The median radiotherapy dose was 60Gy. 916 patients received radiotherapy alone and 433 patients received chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test was used to calculate the local control rate and overall survival. The Cox regression model was used for multivariate prognostic analysis. Results the follow-up rate was 97. 55%.①The total effective rate was 99%. The complete remission rate was 50. 5%, and partial remission 48. 5%, non remission 1%.②The 1,3,5 year local control rate and OS were 75. 2%, 54. 5%, 50. 1% and 68. 6%, 36. 2%,24. 5% respectively. The median survival time was 21 months.③Univariate a-nalysis showed that gender, age, tumor location , the short-term curative effect, chemotherapy , TNM stage, tumor length, maxi-mum diameter of CT, surrounding invasion and volume of GTV were prognostic factors.④Multivariate analysis indicated that age, tumor location , chemotherapy and volume of GTV were independent prognostic factors for OS.⑤The OS of chemoradiotherapy group was better than radiotherapy group, and the concurrent chemoradiotherapy group has more advantage. The OS of cervical and upper thoracic esophageal carcinoma was better than the middle and lower segment; The better radiation dose was 60 ~65Gy. Conclusion the effect of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for esophageal cancer was exact. The age, tumor location , chemotherapy and volume of GTV were independent prognostic factors for OS. With concurrent chemotherapy the OS can be im-proved. The OS of cervical and upper thoracic esophageal carcinoma was better than the middle and lower segment. The better radi-ation dose was 60~65Gy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?