The difference between Kt/V values calculated by two methods
Meng-he YUAN,Lei WANG,Xin-ju ZHAO,Bei WU,Li ZUO
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2017.012.004
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the difference between Kt/V values calculated by two methods (vol-ume method which puts total body water into the variant form of Daugirdas''second generation equation, and weight method based on Daugirdas''second generation equation) and to investigate the impact factors contrib-uting to the difference. Methods The outpatients dialyzed at our department from September 2016 to No-vember 2016 were enrolled. The clinical indices including age, gender, predialysis weight, predialysis and postdialysis plasma urea, predialysis total body water, lean tissue mass (LTM) and adipose tissue mass (ATM) and other clinical data were collected. The Kt/V values calculated by volume method and weight method were compared using paired-t test. Using the difference ratio (the difference of two values divided by the Kt/V val-ue calculated by volume method) of 2%as the boundary, we divided the participants into two groups:non-dif-ference group and difference group. Clinical indices were compared between the two groups. Linear regres-sion was applied to analyze the potential impact factors of the difference between Kt/V values calculated from the two methods. Results A total of 58 outpatients with an average age of 57.603±14.788 years old were en-rolled, and 58.621%(34/58) of them were males. The Kt/V values calculated by volume method and weight method were significantly different (1.591 ± 0.401 vs. 1.557 ± 0.390, t=-9.154, P<0.001) and were positively correlated (r=0.998, P<0.001). Male ratio (81.481% vs. 38.710%, χ2=10.884, P=0.001), ATM/weight (42.170±10.898%vs. 56.765±6.808%, t=6.200, P<0.001), LTM/weight (58.428±9.555%vs. 44.729±6.625%, t=-6.410, P<0.001) and total body water (33.722±6.752 vs. 27.568±5.378, t=-3.861, P<0.001) were signifi-cantly different between non-difference group and difference group, while age (57.111 ± 16.078 vs. 58.032 ± 13.824, t=0.235, P=0.815), postdialysis weight (67.663±13.52 vs. 66.461±11.344, t=-0.368, P=0.714) had no differences between the two groups. Furthermore, we found male patients had bigger difference between Kt/V values calculated by the two methods (0.0202±0.0166 vs. 0.0538±0.0301, t=-5.451, P<0.001). Linear regres-sion analysis showed that ATM/weight (r=0.2705, P<0.001) and ATM/LTM (r=0.0542, P<0.001) were posi-tively correlated with the difference, while LTM/weight was negatively correlated with the difference (r=-0.2091, P<0.001). Conclusion There was statistically significant difference between Kt/V values calculated by volume method and weight method, and the Kt/V value calculated by volume method was always higher than that calculated by weight method in the same patient. The difference between Kt/V values calculated by the two methods was influenced by sex, LTM/weight, ATM/weight and ATM/LTM.