Clinical effect of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in upper ureteral calculi

Zongjie Guan,Zhijun Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2015.14.025
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective To analyze the clinical effects of micro-channel percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard channel percutaneous nephrolithotomy.Methods 118 patients with ureteral calculi in our hospital from May 2010 to May 2014 were selected and divided into micro-channel percutaneous nephrolithotomy group (MCPN) and standard channel percutaneous nephrolithotomy group (SCPN) according to the surgical approach.Observed and compared changes of each indicator in two groups before and after surgery and postoperative recovery.Results The operative time,flushing water volume and operation bleeding of SCPN group were (83.89±11.04)min,(14900±1800)ml,(68.54±8.10) ml respectively,those of MCPN group were (101.66±12.56)min,(21000±1400)ml,(58.28±6.90)ml respectively.After treatment,the level of Scr in MCPN group significantly lowered,with shorter hospital stay and less surgery cost,with statistically significant differences (P<0.05).There were no statistically significant differences in calculi clearance and complication rate (postoperative bleeding,embolization,perforation,sepsis and so on) (P>0.05).Conclusions Micro-channel percutaneous nephrolithotomy for upper ureteral calculi has good clinical efficacy,the type of actual operation can be selected according to the size of calculi.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?