The comparison of determining carbon dioxide in separation gel tube, Heparin lithium tube and traditional drying tube

Jian He,Yong Liu,Hao Zhuang,Junjie Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-1752.2013.33.099
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the impact on four kinds of tubes including separation gel coagulation promoting tubes, heparin lithium coagulation promoting tubes and traditional drying tube(closed and open ) on plasma (serum) carbon dioxide determining. Methods: Analysis the difference on measurements of plasma(serum) carbon dioxide in different condition by using capping or not capping and controling time in four kinds of tubes after col ecting blood samples simultaneously Results: There were no significant differences in the same time period among the results of determining carbon dioxide in three kinds of tubes with capping after water bath heating in 37℃ with 3 hours, while there’s highly significant differences in taditonal drying tube with out capping in determing as the results of carbon dioxide determining in each kinds of tubes with out capping were lower than that with capping in each period. Moreover, the results were droped gradual y with storage period prolonging.Conclusion:The plasma( serum) dioxide obtained by separating gel tubes and Heparin lithium tube were not only preferably in preventing from dioxide losing but also had less impact on carbon dioxide determining with its chemical composition. In addtion they could provide fast seperation of blood specimens for clinic laboratory. Consequently, separation gel tube and Heparin lithium tube are more appropriate for determining carbon dioxide than traditional drying tube.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?