The date/delay effect in intertemporal choice: A combined fMRI and eye‐tracking study
Kristof Keidel,Rebekka Schröder,Peter Trautner,Alexander Radbruch,Carsten Murawski,Ulrich Ettinger
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26585
IF: 4.8
2024-02-26
Human Brain Mapping
Abstract:We used eye‐tracking and fMRI to examine mechanisms of time framing in intertemporal choice. Results revealed that date framing compared to delay unit framing led to higher fixation durations on time attributes and higher brain activity in areas associated with episodic thinking, consistent with hypotheses positing differential time estimation. Temporal discounting, the tendency to devalue future rewards as a function of delay until receipt, is influenced by time framing. Specifically, discount rates are shallower when the time at which the reward is received is presented as a date (date condition; e.g., June 8, 2023) rather than in delay units (delay condition; e.g., 30 days), which is commonly referred to as the date/delay effect. However, the cognitive and neural mechanisms of this effect are not well understood. Here, we examined the date/delay effect by analysing combined fMRI and eye‐tracking data of N = 31 participants completing a temporal discounting task in both a delay and a date condition. The results confirmed the date/delay effect and revealed that the date condition led to higher fixation durations on time attributes and to higher activity in precuneus/PCC and angular gyrus, that is, areas previously associated with episodic thinking. Additionally, participants made more comparative eye movements in the date compared to the delay condition. A lower date/delay effect was associated with higher prefrontal activity in the date > delay contrast, suggesting that higher control or arithmetic operations may reduce the date/delay effect. Our findings are in line with hypotheses positing that the date condition is associated with differential time estimation and the use of more comparative as opposed to integrative choice strategies. Specifically, higher activity in memory‐related brain areas suggests that the date condition leads to higher perceived proximity of delayed rewards, while higher frontal activity (middle/superior frontal gyrus, posterior medial frontal cortex, cingulate) in participants with a lower date/delay effect suggests that the effect is particularly pronounced in participants avoiding complex arithmetic operations in the date condition.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,neurosciences,neuroimaging