Neural basis responsible for episodic future thinking effects on procrastination: The interaction between the cognitive control pathway and emotional processing pathway

Yaqi Yang,Zhiyi Chen,Qi Chen,Tingyong Feng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2021.09.013
IF: 4.644
Cortex
Abstract:Theories on procrastination have proposed that the trade-off between the episodic future thinking (EFT) of positive outcome and negative engagement determines whether to procrastinate. Yet, the neural substrates underlying EFT affects procrastination remain poorly understood. Thus, we adopt a free construction method to obtain individuals' EFT thoughts toward procrastination tasks, and coded these thoughts based on the 2 (emotional valence: positive vs negative) × 2 (imaginary direction: outcome vs engagement) model of EFT (2 × 2 model). Next, a regression analysis was utilized to test the relationship between each dimension in the 2 × 2 model and execution willingness. To explore the neuroanatomical structures underlying EFT, the voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analysis was conducted to find out brain regions responsible for EFT. In addition, the resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) analysis was also utilized to examine the neural pathways underlying EFT affects procrastination. Behavioral results showed combine the anticipated positive outcome with anticipated negative engagement can best predict execution willingness. The VBM analysis revealed that the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) was positively correlated with anticipated positive outcome, while the right hippocampus was positively correlated with anticipated negative engagement. The RSFC results indicated that DLPFC functional connectivity with the right inferior frontal gyrus (RIFG) and left precuneus were positively associated with anticipated positive outcome, whereas the hippocampus connectivity with the left insula was positively associated with anticipated negative engagement. Structural equation model results suggest that EFT affects procrastination through the cognitive control pathway (DLPFC-IFG, DLPFC-precuneus) and emotional processing pathway (hippocampus-insula). Collectively, these findings suggest that task procrastination can be predicted by the interaction of the top-down cognitive control pathway and bottom-up emotional processing pathway.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?