Abstract:We used eye‐tracking and fMRI to examine mechanisms of time framing in intertemporal choice. Results revealed that date framing compared to delay unit framing led to higher fixation durations on time attributes and higher brain activity in areas associated with episodic thinking, consistent with hypotheses positing differential time estimation. Temporal discounting, the tendency to devalue future rewards as a function of delay until receipt, is influenced by time framing. Specifically, discount rates are shallower when the time at which the reward is received is presented as a date (date condition; e.g., June 8, 2023) rather than in delay units (delay condition; e.g., 30 days), which is commonly referred to as the date/delay effect. However, the cognitive and neural mechanisms of this effect are not well understood. Here, we examined the date/delay effect by analysing combined fMRI and eye‐tracking data of N = 31 participants completing a temporal discounting task in both a delay and a date condition. The results confirmed the date/delay effect and revealed that the date condition led to higher fixation durations on time attributes and to higher activity in precuneus/PCC and angular gyrus, that is, areas previously associated with episodic thinking. Additionally, participants made more comparative eye movements in the date compared to the delay condition. A lower date/delay effect was associated with higher prefrontal activity in the date > delay contrast, suggesting that higher control or arithmetic operations may reduce the date/delay effect. Our findings are in line with hypotheses positing that the date condition is associated with differential time estimation and the use of more comparative as opposed to integrative choice strategies. Specifically, higher activity in memory‐related brain areas suggests that the date condition leads to higher perceived proximity of delayed rewards, while higher frontal activity (middle/superior frontal gyrus, posterior medial frontal cortex, cingulate) in participants with a lower date/delay effect suggests that the effect is particularly pronounced in participants avoiding complex arithmetic operations in the date condition.

Altering subjective time perception leads to correlated changes in neural activity and delay discounting impulsivity

Waiting in intertemporal choice tasks affects discounting and subjective time perception.

Dissociated neural substrates underlying impulsive choice and impulsive action.

The Neuroanatomical Correlates of Individual Differences in Delay Discounting: A Voxel-Based Morphometry Study

An “As Soon As Possible” Effect in Human Intertemporal Decision Making: Behavioral Evidence and Neural Mechanisms

Time Discounting: the Delay Effect and Procrastinating Behavior

How time flies: Time perception and intertemporal choice

Individual Differences in Self-Rated Impulsivity Modulate the Estimation of Time in a Real Waiting Situation

The role of time estimation in decreased impatience in intertemporal choice.

The neural mechanisms of inter-temporal decision-making: understanding variability

The date/delay effect in intertemporal choice: A combined fMRI and eye‐tracking study

Brain Stimulation of Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortices Influences Impulsivity in Delay Discounting Choices

Differential Neural Correlates in the Prefrontal Cortex during a Delay Discounting Task in Healthy Adults: An fNIRS Study

Neural representations of the amount and the delay time of reward in intertemporal decision making

Spontaneous neural activity in the three principal networks underlying delay discounting: a resting-state fMRI study

Approaching future rewards or waiting for them to arrive: Spatial representations of time and intertemporal choice

Brain mechanisms of temporal processing in impulsivity: Relevance to attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder

Temporal Dynamics of the Interaction between Reward and Time Delay during Intertemporal Choice

A general theory of intertemporal decision-making and the perception of time

Impatient to Receive or Impatient to Achieve: How Goal Gradients and Time Discounting Jointly Determine Intertemporal Choice

Dopamine and temporal discounting: revisiting pharmacology and individual differences