Abstract:The intersection between international law and theOlympic Games is hardly explored at all, although the potential encounters aremany and varied. In light of the forthcoming 2021OlympicGames (rescheduled from 2020 due to the Covid pandemic), this symposium analyzes the contemporary legal questions triggered by the Olympics and examines what the application of international law in this unique setting reveals. As such, it aims to fill the gap in the literature on the international legal issues that emerge from the convergence of thousands of athletes from a wide range of states at a single sporting event—and one that is privately ordered. Various bodies of law are involved in one manner or another in this particular set of circumstances. The legal status of the norms in question vary depending on whether we are referring to principles of international law, to non-binding instruments, to secondary law adopted within the framework of multilateral conventions, to national laws or to contracts. The six essays that make up this symposium illustrate these various normative facets through selected themes. The themes include the notion of citizenship and how athletes use their talents to obtain citizenship, state recognition, and Olympic participation, the way in which the Olympics brings contemporary human rights and environmental challenges to the forefront and the legal instruments that are resorted to for promoting their respect. Moreover, the efficacy and normative contours of the self-regulating private legal order that is the Olympics deserve attention. The governance of the Olympic Games is often characterized by pragmatism. The initiatives taken with respect to dispute settlement offer a revealing example. In this context, due to the specific organizational requirements of the Olympic Games, special procedures designed to settle disputes within a very short timeframe were needed. A dedicated structure within the Court of Arbitration for Sport—functioning in situ—was first established in 1996 and has existed since then for each edition of the Olympic Games.1 In 2016, an additional division dealing with anti-doping disputes was created. The need for efficiency and speed resulted in succinct and clear rules of procedure for these dispute mechanisms.2 Human rights and environmental protection concerns have also prompted legal initiatives. As a reaction to increasing pressure from civil society to address adverse human rights impacts during the Olympic Games, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) has promoted the inclusion of human rights provisions into the bidding process and hosting regulations for the Olympic Games. Daniela Heerdt from Tilburg Law School writes about the costs and benefits of embedding such human rights concepts in these bidding and hosting agreements.3 She reveals that, from a rights-holder perspective, the benefits are in fact rather meaningless. Her analysis sheds light

The Study between the Olympic Rules and Law

Discussion on Solution Mechanism of Sports Competition Dispute in China

An Analysis of Fair Competition Related Cases Occurring During the London Olympic Games

Introduction to the Symposium on the Olympics and International Law

Research on Legal Protection of Intangible Asset of Chinese Olympic Committee

On the Fundamental Issues in Sport Law

Historical Changes of the Concept of Modern Olympic Games and Its Sociological Factors

Economic cooperation between public and private sectors – a comparative analysis of the Olympic Games in Athens 2004 and London 2012

On Protect the Intellectual Property Rights of the Olympic Symbol

Difficulties and Solution for Rules of International Sports Arbitration-A Jurisprudential Analysis of Case of Mohamed Bin Hammam v.FIFA

Political protest and Rule 50: exploring the polycentric governance of international and Olympic sport

Research on Olympic Spirit and Sports Politicization Limit under the Background of Network Public Opinion

EU sports law: a uniform algorithm for regulatory rules

Are the Olympic Games Pure?——The Strategic Marketing Relation Between the Olympic Games and the Youth Olympic Games

Intellectual Property Protection of Olympic Insignia: an International and Comparative Perspective

The history of politicization of sports in Western countries: the case of the Olympic Games in Russia and China

Analysis of the Fairness of Social Sport from the Perspective of Policy

When sports rules go awry

Research on the Thought of Sports Rule of Law in the Sixth Plenary Session of the 19th CPC Central Committee

Study of Realization Mechanism on Efficiency and Fairness of Sports for All in China

On the Mechanism of Event Competition Organizing and Cooperation in Beijing Olympics Games