Abstract:Active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) can be summarized as follows: it inherits from proportional–integral–derivative (PID) the quality that makes it such a success: the error driven, rather than model-based, control law; it takes from modern control theory its best offering: the state observer; it embraces the power of nonlinear feedback and puts it to full use; it is a useful digital control technology developed out of an experimental platform rooted in computer simulations. ADRC is made possible only when control is taken as an experimental science, instead of a mathematical one. It is motivated by the ever increasing demands from industry that requires the control technology to move beyond PID, which has dominated the practice for over 80 years. Specifically, there are four areas of weakness in PID that we strive to address: 1) the error computation; 2) noise degradation in the derivative control; 3) oversimplification and the loss of performance in the control law in the form of a linear weighted sum; and 4) complications brought by the integral control. Correspondingly, we propose four distinct measures: 1) a simple differential equation as a transient trajectory generator; 2) a noise-tolerant tracking differentiator; 3) the nonlinear control laws; and 4) the concept and method of total disturbance estimation and rejection. Together, they form a new set of tools and a new way of control design. Times and again in experiments and on factory floors, ADRC proves to be a capable replacement of PID with unmistakable advantage in performance and practicality, providing solutions to pressing engineering problems of today. With the new outlook and possibilities that ADRC represents, we further believe that control engineering may very well break the hold of classical PID and enter a new era, an era that brings back the spirit of innovations.

Application and the Param-Eter Setting of ADRC Based on Genetic Arithmetic

A Robust MPC Technique with Adaptive Disturbance Model

Application research on improved genetic algorithm and active disturbance rejection control on quadcopters

Development status of active disturbance rejection control

A Simulative Study on Active Disturbance Rejection Control (ADRC) as a Control Tool for Practitioners

Tuning Method for Second-Order Active Disturbance Rejection Control

Internal model based active disturbance rejection control

From PID to Active Disturbance Rejection Control

Tuning Adrc for Multi-Variable System Based on Existing Pid Parameters

Improved Active Disturbance Rejection Control for the DAB Converter with 4-DF Modulation

Advancement of Active Disturbance Rejection Control and Its Applications in Power Electronics

Practical Active Disturbance Rejection Control: Bumpless Transfer, Rate Limitation and Incremental Algorithm

A modified active disturbance rejection control strategy based on cascade structure with enhanced robustness

Active Disturbance Rejection Controller for Loitering Unit with Parameter Uncertainty

Quantitative Analysis on the Phase Margin of ADRC

ADRC Applied in Chaotic Arrhythmic Heartbeats Control

A Robust Control Methodology Based on Active Disturbance Rejection Control and Input Shaping

Active disturbance rejection controller design for distributed parameter systems

Performance Robustness Comparison of ADRC and GPC

Active Disturbance Rejection Control Design for High-Order Integral Systems

Active Disturbance Rejection Control of Bearingless Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Based on Genetic Algorithm and Neural Network Parameters Dynamic Adjustment Method