Abstract:Active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) can be summarized as follows: it inherits from proportional–integral–derivative (PID) the quality that makes it such a success: the error driven, rather than model-based, control law; it takes from modern control theory its best offering: the state observer; it embraces the power of nonlinear feedback and puts it to full use; it is a useful digital control technology developed out of an experimental platform rooted in computer simulations. ADRC is made possible only when control is taken as an experimental science, instead of a mathematical one. It is motivated by the ever increasing demands from industry that requires the control technology to move beyond PID, which has dominated the practice for over 80 years. Specifically, there are four areas of weakness in PID that we strive to address: 1) the error computation; 2) noise degradation in the derivative control; 3) oversimplification and the loss of performance in the control law in the form of a linear weighted sum; and 4) complications brought by the integral control. Correspondingly, we propose four distinct measures: 1) a simple differential equation as a transient trajectory generator; 2) a noise-tolerant tracking differentiator; 3) the nonlinear control laws; and 4) the concept and method of total disturbance estimation and rejection. Together, they form a new set of tools and a new way of control design. Times and again in experiments and on factory floors, ADRC proves to be a capable replacement of PID with unmistakable advantage in performance and practicality, providing solutions to pressing engineering problems of today. With the new outlook and possibilities that ADRC represents, we further believe that control engineering may very well break the hold of classical PID and enter a new era, an era that brings back the spirit of innovations.

Tuning Method for Second-Order Active Disturbance Rejection Control

A Tuning Method of Active Disturbance Rejection Control for a Class of High-Order Processes.

A Relay Feedback Method for the Tuning of Linear Active Disturbance Rejection Controllers

Improved 2-Order Active Disturbance Rejection Control for PMSM

On Tuning and Practical Implementation of Active Disturbance Rejection Controller: A Case Study from a Regenerative Heater in a 1000 MW Power Plant

Quantitative Tuning of Active Disturbance Rejection Controller for FOPTD Model With Application to Power Plant Control

A Simulative Study on Active Disturbance Rejection Control (ADRC) as a Control Tool for Practitioners

Tuning Adrc for Multi-Variable System Based on Existing Pid Parameters

Parameter Tuning for Decentralized Low-Order Active Disturbance Rejection Control Scheme

Tuning of Active Disturbance Rejection Control with Application to Power Plant Furnace Regulation

Active Disturbance Rejection Controller for High-Order System

Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Control System Based on No Manual Tuned Active Disturbance Rejection Control

A synthesis method for first-order active disturbance rejection controllers: Procedures and field tests

Tuning of Linear Active Disturbance Rejection Controllers Based on Step Response Curves

Active Disturbance Rejection Control Design for High-Order Integral Systems

Performance Analysis of Improved ADRCs for a Class of High-Order Processes with Verification on Main Steam Pressure Control

Robust Compensation for Active Disturbance Rejection Control of a Class of High‐order Systems with Large Time Delay: Simulation and Experimental Studies

Development status of active disturbance rejection control

Frequency response-based decoupling tuning for feedforward compensation ADRC of distributed parameter systems

Maximum Sensitivity-Constrained Data-Driven Active Disturbance Rejection Control with Application to Airflow Control in Power Plant

From PID to Active Disturbance Rejection Control