Abstract:To those of us who are sold on history, it may seem non-controversial to suggest that the learning and teaching of chemistry should give cognisance to the historical development of the subject. However, this suggestion is proving controversial amongst some in the chemistry profession. For example, in the October 2010 edition of Chemistry in Australia, Rami Ibo takes issue with the emphasis on the history of science in the HSC chemistry curriculum (Year 12) in New South Wales. He studied chemistry, physics and biology for his HSC in NSW and concluded that, because the primary focus of these three sciences was History of Science, ‘There was hardly any content that challenged our minds, and calculations barely involved plugging in numbers into an equation…. We were required to recall Antoine Lavoisier’s experiments that led to the theories of acids and bases… while my friends in Lebanon were studying ideal gas laws, chemical kinetics, acids and bases, organic chemistry, soaps and detergents, medicinal chemistry and new materials’ (Ibo, Chemistry in Australia 77(9): 5, 2010). What does the literature have to say in response to such arguments? Does the presence of the history of chemistry in a curriculum necessarily reduce important content and problem-solving skills?A study of the literature suggests at least three reasons for persisting with aspects of the history of chemistry in the learning and teaching of chemistry.The fact that student conceptions sometimes recapitulate early ideas found in the history of chemistry is seen as offering teachers a means of a deeper understanding of student ideas with the potential for more positive learning outcomes.Conceptual clarity is more easily achieved within an historical context. Often conceptual usefulness is pursued at the expense of conceptual depth (de Berg, Conceptual Depth and Conceptual Usefulness in Chemistry: Issues and Challenges for Chemistry Educators. In I. V. Eriksson (Ed.), Science Education in the 21st Century (pp. 165–182). New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2008a).The history of chemistry directly gives us some idea of the epistemological status of chemistry within science and knowledge in general and therefore gives a student access to aspects of the Nature of Science.This review chapter also examines different ways the history of chemistry has been incorporated into chemistry curricula and looks at the purported advantages, disadvantages and limitations of such attempts. Some directions for future research in this area are included in the chapter.

Historical Action and the Contemporary Enlightenment of Phlogiston Theory

The rise and fall of the phlogiston theory: a tool to explain the use of models in science education

The History of the Phlogiston Theory

Richard Kirwan's Phlogiston Theory: Its Success and Fate

Significance of Education of Chemical History:Development History of Fluorescence

Scientific pluralism and the Chemical Revolution

[Teaching science: realism, anti-realism and the construction of the concept of oxygen]

Fermentation, phlogiston and matter theory: chemistry and natural philosophy in Georg Ernst Stahl's Zymotechnia Fundamentalis

Development of Theoretical Chemistry in China

The Place of the History of Chemistry in the Teaching and Learning of Chemistry

Teach philosophy of science

The History of Chemistry in Chemical Education

A Brief History of the Development of Chromatography and Its Enlightenment to Us

Loose building blocks in the edifice of electrochemistry in a historical perspective and their impact on the teaching

Theoretical Chemistry and New Energy Sources

Development Tendency and Reform Discussion of Physical Chemistry Experiment Teaching

The beginnings of chemistry: from ancient times until 1661

Reflections on Teaching of History of Science and the Method of Historiography

Research and development of SHS theory (2)

Combustion at a Crossroads: Status and Prospects

Experimental History: the Appeal of Postmodernism in Historiography