Analysis on Bridge Seismic Fragility Based on Uniform Design Response Surface Method

Li-feng LI,Hui-hui LI,Kai-duo XU,Si-cong HU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-0268.2017.11.015
2017-01-01
Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development
Abstract:In view of the research situation of large calculation in bridge seismic fragility analysis, taking a multi-span continuous girder bridge as the research object, an alternative seismic fragility analysis method is proposed based the uniform design response surface methodology at first. This proposed method can take the uncertainties derived from material, structure and ground motion into account. The nonlinear finite element model of the case studied bridge is built based on OpenSees program. Then, considering the damage of bridge components such as piers and bearings, the damage indexes of piers and bearings in different limit states are defined, and the corresponding seismic fragility curves of bridge components and bridge system are established. Finally, to verify the suitability and effectiveness of the proposed method in bridge seismic fragility analysis, the proposed method, Monte Carlo ( MC) , orthogonal design and central composite design ( CCD) response surface method are used to carry out the seismic fragility analysis. The abovementioned methods are compared in terms of sampling frequency, time-consuming, response surface model accuracy and seismic fragility curves. The result indicates that (1) compared with Monte Carlo response surface method, the deviation of component fragility curve of the proposed method is about 3%; ( 2 ) compared with Monte Carlo, central composite design and orthogonal design response surface method, the proposed method reduced by 99. 70%, 58. 49% and 8. 70% in sampling frequency, time-consuming of finite element calculation respectively;(3) compared with central composite design and orthogonal design response surface method, the accuracy of the structural response surface model established by the proposed method is increased by 12%and 5% respectively.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?