Comparison of in-plane and out-of-plane ultrasound in radial artery annulation at different depths

Hua WANG,Changna WEI,Hong XIE
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the effect of in-plane and out-of-plane technology on the arterial catheterization in different subcutaneous distances.Methods A total of 120 patients scheduled for radial artery catheterization were divided into four groups (n =30):group A (in-plane performance with subcutaneous distance ≥2.8 mm),group B (out-of-plane performance with subcutaneous distance≥2.8 mm),group C (in-plane performance with subcutaneous distance<2.8 mm),and group D (out-of-plane performance with subcutaneous distance< 2.8 mm).The total times of puncture,puncture attempts,the first successful cases and the first successful puncture time were recorded.Results The subcutaneous distance and radial artery diameter of groups A and B were significantly longer than those of groups C and D (all P<0.01).Compared with those in groups A and C,the first puncture success rate were significantly increased in groups B and D (both P<0.05),while the first successful puncture time were significantly decreased (both P<0.05).Compared with those in groups A and B,the first puncture success rates were significantly increased in groups C and D (both P<0.05),while the first successful puncture times were significantly decreased (both P<0.05).There were no significant difference in puncture time or attempts between the groups (all P > 0.05).Conclusion Ultrasound-guided radial artery cannulation can be performed easily when subcutaneous distance is greater than 2.8 mm.Compared with in-plane technology,radial artery cannulation guided by out-of-plane technology needs less time,and with higher first success rate.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?