Abstract:Objective: Systemic systolic (SAP) and mean (MAP) arterial pressure monitoring is the cornerstone in hemodynamic management of the cardiac surgical patient, and the radial artery is the most common site of catheter placement. The present study compared 3 different arterial line procedures. It is hypothesized that a 20-G 12.7- cm catheter inserted into the radial artery will be equal to a 20-G 12.7- cm angiocath placed in the brachial artery, and superior to a 20-G 5.00 cm angiocath placed in the radial artery. Design: A prospective randomized control study was performed. Setting: Single academic university hospital. Participants: Adult patients ≥18 years old undergoing nonemergent cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Interventions: After approval by the Rhode Island Hospital institutional review board, a randomized prospective control study to evaluate 3 different peripheral intraarterial catheter systems was performed: (1) Radial Short (RS): 20-G 5- cm catheter; (2) Radial Long (RL): 20-G 12- cm catheter; and (3) Brachial Long (BL): 20-G 12- cm catheter. Measurements and results: Gradients between central aortic and peripheral catheters (CA-P) were compared and analyzed before CPB and 2 and 10 minutes after separation from CPB. The placement of femoral arterial lines and administration of vasoactive medications were recorded. After exclusions, 67 BL, 61 RL, and 66 RS patients were compared. Before CPB, CA-P SAP and MAP gradients were not significant among the 3 groups. Two minutes after CPB, the CA-P SAP gradient was significant for the RS group (p = 0.005) and insignificant for BL (p = 0.47) and RL (p = 0.39). Two-group analysis revealed that CA-P SAP gradients are similar between BL and RL (p = 0.84), both of which were superior to RS (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04, respectively). At 10 minutes after CPB, the CA-P SAP gradient for RS remained significant (p = 0.004) and similar to the gradient at 2 minutes. The CA-P SAP gradients increased from 2 to 10 minutes for BL (p = 0.13) and RL (p = 0.06). Two minutes after CPB, the CA-P MAP gradients were significant for the BL (p = 0.003), RL (p < 0.0001), and RS (p < 0.0001) groups. Two-group analysis revealed that the CA-P MAP gradients were lower for the BL group compared with the RL (p = 0.054) and RS (p< 0.05) groups. Ten minutes after CPB, the CA-P MAP gradients in the RL and RS groups remained significant (p < 0.0001) and both greater than the BL group (p = 0.002). A femoral arterial line was placed more frequently in the RS group (8/66 = 12.1%) than in the RL group (3/61 = 4.9%) and the BL group (2/67 = 3.0%). Vasopressin was administered significantly more frequently in the RS group. Conclusion: Regarding CA-P SAP gradients, the RL group performed equally to the BL group, both being superior to RS. Regarding CA-P MAP gradients, BL was superior to RL and RS. Clinically, femoral line placement and vasopressin administration were fewer for the BL and RL groups when compared with the RS group. This study demonstrated the benefits of a long (12.7 cm) 20- G angiocath placed in the radial artery.

Optimal insertion site for ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization utilizing the dynamic needle tip positioning technique: A prospective randomized controlled study

Ultrasound-guided modified dynamic needle tip positioning technique for distal radial artery catheterization: A randomized controlled trial

Dynamic Needle Tip Positioning Versus the Angle-Distance Technique for Ultrasound-Guided Radial Artery Cannulation in Adults: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Distal Radial Artery Access is a Safe and Feasible Technique in the Anatomical Snuffbox for Visceral Intervention

Ultrasound Guidance Facilitates Radial Artery Catheterization: A Meta-analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

"Modified Dynamic Needle Tip Positioning" Short-Axis, Out-of-Plane, Ultrasound-Guided Radial Artery Cannulation in Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Routine preprocedural ultrasound in palpation versus ultrasound guided radial access for cardiac catheterization

Ultrasound-Guided Dynamic Needle-Tip Positioning Method Is Superior to Conventional Palpation and Ultrasound Method in Arterial Catheterization

Comparison of ultrasound guided dorsal radial artery cannulation and conventional radial artery cannulation at the volar aspect of wrist: A pilot randomized controlled trial

Modified Long-Axis In-plane Technique for Radial Artery Cannulation in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial

A new method for facilitating ultrasound-guided in-plane cannulation of the subclavian vein: a randomized clinical trial

The Improved Catheterization is Associated with the Deeper Radial Arteries in Ultrasound-Guided Dynamic Needle Tip Positioning Technique.

Long-axis in-plane combined with short-axis out-of-plane technique in ultrasound-guided arterial catheterization in infants: A randomized controlled trial

Clinical Utility of Ultrasonographic Guidance for Arterial Catheterization in Patients with Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Factors Contributing Successful Ultrasound-guided Radial Artery Cannulation and Its Complications when Using the Short-axis Out-of-plane Procedure

Comparison Between Distal Trans-radial Access and Conventional Trans-radial Access for Coronary Angiography

Hemodynamic Monitoring In The Cardiac Surgical Patient: Comparison of Three Arterial Catheters

Ultrasound-guided access to the distal radial artery at the anatomical snuffbox for catheter-based vascular interventions: a technical guide

Comparison of Single-operator Laser-assisted Ultrasound-guided Radial Arterial Cannulation in Young Children with Traditional Ultrasound Guidance: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Two-Step Distal Radial Artery Cannulation for Challenging Radial Anatomies

Radial Approach for Patients with ST-segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: It is Definitely the Best Access Site.