Diagnostic value and clinical feature of ST-segment depression limited to the recovery phase of treadmill exercise test

Lan Wang,Xuhang Huang,Danjie Guo,Lin Guo,Wenying Cao,Ruxin Wen,Wenzheng Zhang,Jun Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2015.22.003
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the diagnostic value and clinical feature of ST-segment depression limited to the recovery phase of a treadmill exercise test, as compared with that of ST-segment depression appearing during exercise. Methods Clinical and angiographic data was compared for 140 consecutive patients who developed ST-segment depression during the exercise phase of an exercise test (exercise group) and for 36 patients who developed ST-segment depression limited to the recovery phase of the exercise test (recovery group). Results There were no differences between the 2 groups in major clinical feature. Significant coronary artery stenosis were found in 78 exercise group patients (55.7%) and in 22 recovery group patients (61.1%, P=0.348). However the involvement rate of LAD was higher in recovery group (100%) than that in exercise group (83.3%, P=0.031). As to treadmill exercise test, compared with exercise group, recovery group patients showed higher peak SBP level (165±23 mmHg vs. 177±17 mmHg, P=0.010), lower rate of premature termination (31.4% vs. 11.1%, P=0.003), shorter duration of exercise [(416±146)s vs. (337±144)s, P=0.003] and shorter duration of ST-segment depression [462 (120-1 114) s vs. 294 (120-831) s, P=0.029]. Conclusion The diagnostic power of ST-segment depression limited to the recovery phase of an exercise test is equal to that of ST-segment depression induced during effort. Involvement rate of LAD was seem to be higher in recovery group than that in exercise group. And the gender and age feathers between 2 groups are similar.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?