Abstract:Objective:To propose a markless patient setup workflow based on the optical surface monitoring system (AlignRT) and open-face mask immobilization for whole-course head tumor radiotherapy, assess the setup time and repositioning frequency of the proposed workflow, and conduct a comparative analysis of the differences, correlation, and consistency of the setup errors of the AlignRT and cone beam CT (CBCT) systems.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted for the data on the errors of 132 fractionated setup based on open-face mask immobilization of 33 head tumor patients. AlignRT-guided markless patient setup workflow was applied throughout the radiotherapy. Meanwhile, the body structures automatically generated by the treatment planning system were used as body references. The 6-degree-of-freedom (6DoF) setup errors (lateral, vertical, longitudinal, rotation, pitch, roll, and yaw directions), setup time, and repositioning frequency of the AlignRT and CBCT systems were recorded and analyzed. The Wilcoxon and Spearman analyses were used to statistically assess the differences and correlation of the setup errors of the two systems. Moreover, the Bland-Altman analysis was employed to evaluate the consistency of the two systems.Results:The 6DoF setup errors of CBCT were within the clinical tolerance (linear motions: -0.30 to 0.30 cm; rotational motions: -2.0° to 2.0°). The setup time and repositioning frequency of CBCT were (98 ± 31) s and 1.51% (2/132), respectively. There was no significant difference in setup errors between the two systems except those in x-axis ( Z = -3.11, P= 0.002), y-axis ( Z = -7.40, P<0.001), and Pitch ( Z= -4.48, P<0.001). There was a significant positive correlation between the setup errors along lateral ( rs = 0.47, P<0.001) and vertical ( rs = 0.29, P = 0.001) directions, rotation (Rtn; rs = 0.47, P<0.001), pitch (Pitch; rs = 0.28, P = 0.001) and roll (Roll; rs = 0.45, P<0.001) of the two systems. The 95% limits of agreement (95% LoA) of 6DoF setup errors were -0.12 to 0.09 cm, -0.07 to 0.17 cm, -0.19 to 0.20 cm, -1.0° to 0.9 °, -1.0° to 1.5°, and -0.9° to 1.0°, respectively. The 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of 95% LoA was -0.14 to 0.11 cm, -0.09 to 0.19 cm, -0.23 to 0.23 cm, -1.2° to 1.1°, -1.2° to 1.7°, and-1.0° to 1.1°, respectively, all of which were within the permissible error ranges. The 6DoF setup error difference of 3.41% (27/792< 5%) was beyond the 95% LoA. The maximum absolute differences of 6DoF setup errors within the 95% LoA were 0.12, 0.16, 0.19 cm, 0.9°, 1.5°, and 1.0°, respectively. Conclusions:The proposed markless setup workflow based on AlignRT combined with open-face mask immobilization for whole-course head tumor radiotherapy exhibits reasonable agreement and consistency with the patient setup using CBCT, with acceptable clinical efficiency. It can be applied to the first radiotherapy and the real-time monitoring of therapy to improve the safety and thus is of value in clinical applications.

Study on customized polyurethane foam head and neck support in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck neoplasms using coneb-beam CT

Clinical value of styrofoam fixation in intracranial tumor radiotherapy

Companison of Dose Distribution and Setup Error of Two Different Positions and Immobilization Techniques in Breast Cancer Radiotherapy

Application of a New Method for Patient Positioning Based on Optical Surface Monitoring Technology to Head Radiotherapy

Workflow and error analyses of patient setup based on open-face mask immobilization combined with AlignRT for head tumor radiotherapy

Study on the application of personalization customized oral positioning stent in head and neck cancer patients with intensity modulated radiation therapy

Application of chest positioning reference line combined with infrared positioning system in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Study on the application of 3D printing head film fixation technology in cranial radiotherapy

Comparison of Set-Up Errors Detected by EPID and CBCT Using Two Different Immobilization ;techniques for Patients with Nasopharygeal Carcinoma

A Clinical Evaluation of Setup Errors in IMRT Using Cone Beam CT for Head and Neck Cancer

SU-GG-J-109: A Study on Image Guided Radiotherapy Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) for Head and Neck Cancer IMRT Patient Setup

Influence of lower limb movements on setup errors in radiotherapy for rectal cancer using kilovoltage cone-beam CT (KV-CBCT)

Set-up error and dosimetric analysis of HexaPOD evo RT 6D couch combined with cone beam CT image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for primary malignant tumor of the cervical spine

Megavoltage Cone-Beam CT-guided Radiation Therapy of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in the Process of Positioning Precision

Quantifying thermoplastic mask quality for precision radiotherapy in head and neck cancer: A 3D stress test and 6D-axis error analysis

Set-up errors in three-dimensional conformal/intensity-modulated radiation therapy measured with repeat CT scans for reducing taget volume

Megavoltage cone-beam CT in the evaluation of set-up errors in head and neck cancers treated with precision radiotherapy

Optimisation of cone beam CT radiotherapy imaging protocols using a novel 3D printed head and neck anthropomorphic phantom

Design and fabrication of personalized customized oral positioning stent for radiotherapy of head and neck tumor

Feasibility and Effectiveness of Self-Made Tiltable Treatment Couch in Minimizing Setup Errors of Radiotherapy for Thoracic and Abdominal Tumors

The clinical effect of Body-Fix(R) device in improving the positioning accuracy of the hypofractionated radiotherapy in the vertebral metastatic patients