Abstract:Animal societies are shaped both by social processes and by the physical environment in which social interactions take place. While many studies take the observed patterns of inter-individual interactions as products and proxies of pure social processes, or as links between resource availability and social structure, the role of the physical configuration of habitat features in shaping the social system of group-living animals remains largely overlooked. We hypothesise that by shaping the decisions about when and where to move, physical features of the environment will impact which individuals more frequently encounter one another and in doing so the overall social structure and social organization of populations. We first discuss how the spatial arrangement of habitat components (i.e. habitat configuration) can shape animal movements using empirical cases in the literature. Then, we draw from the empirical literature to discuss how movement patterns of individuals mediate the patterns of social interactions and social organization and highlight the role of network-based approaches in identifying, evaluating and partitioning the effects of habitat configuration on animal social structure or organization. We illustrate the combination of these mechanisms using a simple simulation. Finally, we discuss the implications of habitat configuration in shaping the ecology and evolution of animal societies and offer a framework for future studies. We highlight future directions for studies in animal societies that are increasingly important in widely human-modified landscapes, in particular the implications of habitat-driven social structure in evolution.Significance statementThere is now clear evidence that simple processes can generate apparent complex patterns of social structure. However, while studies such as those on collective behaviour and social networks have been focused on processes involving individual decision-making, broader patterns of social structure and social organization can also be shaped by factors that have more fundamental impacts on the movements of animals. One set of those factors is related to the amount and spatial arrangement of both biotic and abiotic components of the habitat in which animals live. Examples include the configuration formed by habitat patches connected through corridors, by the presence of hard boundaries between habitat types or by the uneven distribution of resources, mates and competitors across space. In this contribution, we highlight the potential effects of these, which are becoming increasingly important as studies start being able to track populations spanning larger landscapes.

A Diversity Of Mixed-Species Associations

Mixed company: a framework for understanding the composition and organization of mixed-species animal groups

Interspecific Sociality Alters the Colonization and Extinction Rates of Birds on Subtropical Reservoir Islands.

Identifying the social context of single- and mixed-species group formation in large African herbivores

Ecosystems with mutually exclusive interactions self-organize to a state of high diversity

Why do dolphins form mixed-species associations in the Azores ?

The Structure of Mixed-Species Bird Flocks, and Their Response to Anthropogenic Disturbance, with Special Reference to East Asia

The Habitat Type and Scale Dependences of Interspecific Associations in a Subtropical Evergreen Broad-Leaved Forest

Modeling vigilance in mixed‐species groups

A unifying framework for quantifying the nature of animal interactions

Heterogeneity of Interaction Strengths and Its Consequences on Ecological Systems

The role of habitat configuration in shaping social structure: a gap in studies of animal social complexity

Multi-habitat landscapes are more diverse and stable with improved function

Odd prey in mixed species groups suffer fewer attacks than lone individuals

High association strengths are linked to phenotypic similarity, including plumage color and patterns, of participants in mixed-species bird flocks of southwestern China

Neighbourhood benthic configuration reveals hidden co-occurrence social diversity

Diversity of Interaction Types and Ecological Community Stability

Contrasting morphological and acoustic trait spaces suggest distinct benefits to participants in mixed-species bird flocks

Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures

Publisher Correction: Heterogeneity Within and among Co-Occurring Foundation Species Increases Biodiversity

When can higher‐order interactions produce stable coexistence?