Abstract:<p>Hypotheses about the mechanisms of community assembly suggest that biotic and abiotic filters constrain species establishment through selection on their functional traits. It is unclear how differences in traits influence the niche dimensions of closely‐related bird species when they co‐exist in spatiotemporally heterogeneous environments. Further, it is necessary to take into account their participation in mixed‐species flocks, social systems that can include both competition and facilitation. For six years, we conducted counts of forest bird species, and took measurements of environmental variables along an elevational gradient in the Nanling Mountains, China. To disentangle different deterministic and historical/stochastic processes between flocking and non‐flocking bird assemblages, we first compared phylogenetic and functional structure, and community‐weighted mean trait values (CWM). We further assessed elevational variations in trait–environment relationships using a combination of RLQ and fourth‐corner analyses. We found that the flocking and non‐flocking bird assemblages were structured by environmental gradients in contrasting ways. The non‐flocking assemblage showed a strong change from over‐dispersed to clustered community structure with increasing elevations, consistent with the strong selective pressures of a harsh environment (i.e. environmental filtering). The non‐flocking assemblage also displayed significant trait–environment relationships in bivariate correlations and multivariate ordination space, including specific morphological and foraging traits that are linked to vegetation characteristics (e.g. short trees at high elevations). By contrast, flocking birds were more resilient to habitat change with elevation, with relatively consistent community membership and showed fewer trait–environment associations. CWM of traits that are known to be associated with species' propensity to join mixed‐species flocks, including small body size and broad habitat specificity, were linked to the flocking assemblage consistently across the elevational gradient. Collectively, our trait‐based analyses provide strong evidence that trait–environment relationships differ between flocking and non‐flocking bird assemblages. Besides serving as bellwethers of changing environments, emergent properties of flock systems may increase the resilience of animal communities undergoing environmental change. Mixed‐species flocks present an ideal model with which to explore co‐occurrence of closely‐related species, because habitat filtering may be buffered, and the patterns observed are therefore the outcomes of species interactions including both competition and facilitation.</p>

Contrasting morphological and acoustic trait spaces suggest distinct benefits to participants in mixed-species bird flocks

The Structure of Mixed-Species Bird Flocks, and Their Response to Anthropogenic Disturbance, with Special Reference to East Asia

Acoustic similarity of flight calls corresponds with the composition and structure of mixed-species flocks of migrating birds: evidence from a three-dimensional microphone array

Positive Relationships Between Association Strength and Phenotypic Similarity Characterize the Assembly of Mixed-Species Bird Flocks Worldwide

Trait–environment relationships differ between mixed‐species flocking and nonflocking bird assemblages

Does mixed-species flocking influence how birds respond to a gradient of land-use intensity?

Aviary Measurements of Dominance and Affiliation Between Members of Mixed-Species Birds Flocks in Southern China

Interspecific Sociality Alters the Colonization and Extinction Rates of Birds on Subtropical Reservoir Islands.

Bamboozling Interactions: Interspecific associations within mixed-species bird flocks in bamboo in the Eastern Himalaya

Regional Variation in the Composition and Structure of Mixed-Species Bird Flocks in the Western Ghats and Sri Lanka

The influence of a single species on the space use of mixed-species flocks in Amazonian Peru

Measurement of Species Associations in Mixed-Species Bird Flocks Across Environmental and Human Disturbance Gradients

Island Biogeography of Mixed‐species Bird Flocks: A Gregarious Nuclear Species Influences Island Area Effects

High association strengths are linked to phenotypic similarity, including plumage color and patterns, of participants in mixed-species bird flocks of southwestern China

Vocal species are more central in Eastern Himalayan Mixed-Species bird flocks

Asymmetric information in mixed-species mobbing flocks: why are leader species special?

Can Convergence in Mixed-Species Flocks Lead to Evolutionary Divergence? Evidence for and Methods to Test This Hypothesis

Functional Traits Including Interspecific Sociality Affect Mobbing Behaviour in a Bird Community of Southern China

Global analysis of acoustic frequency characteristics in birds

Testing the Roles of Species in Mixed-Species Bird Flocks of a Sri Lankan Rain Forest

Are Vocal Characteristics Related to Leadership Patterns in Mixed‐species Bird Flocks?