An Improved Method to Estimate Actual Vapor Pressure Without Relative Humidity Data

Rangjian Qiu,Longan Li,Shaozhong Kang,Chunwei Liu,Zhenchang Wang,Edward P. Cajucom,Baozhong Zhang,Evgenios Agathokleous

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108306

IF: 6.2

2021-01-01

Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Abstract:Estimating actual vapor pressure (e(a)) without relative humidity (RH) data continues to draw research attention. One of the accurate ways to estimate e(a) is through estimation of dew point temperature (T-dew) from minimum (T-min) or mean temperature (T-mean). Two existing methods have been largely used to estimate e(a). The first method (method I) assumes that T-dew is close to T-min. The other one (method II) adjusts T-dew from T-min with piecewise correction factors (a(T)) from sub-humid to hyper arid regions, and from T-mean with a fixed correction factor, a(D), in humid regions. Here, two methods are proposed to estimate e(a). The first method (method III) adjusts T-dew from T-min with dynamic a(T) based on the correlation function between a(T) and aridity index (AI) regardless of climate zones. The second method (method IV) adjusts T-dew from T-min with dynamic a(T) when AI < 1.00 and from T-mean with a(D) when AI >= 1.00. The performance of four methods was evaluated based on data from 886 meteorological stations distributed from hyper-arid to humid regions. Results showed that there was a significant logarithmic correlation function between a(T) and AI, but no significant correlation between a(T) and AI. Daily values of e(a) estimated by method I were greatly overestimated in semi-arid to hyper-arid regions, but were reasonably estimated in humid regions. The accuracy of method II was improved in hyper-arid to dry sub-humid regions but decreased in humid regions, compared to method I. The proposed methods (III and IV) further improved the accuracy and produced reasonable estimation of daily e(a) in hyper-arid to humid regions, and method III produced a slightly better performance than method IV. Similar results were also observed for estimation of monthly e(a). Therefore, the proposed method III is highly recommended to estimate daily and monthly e(a) when RH data are unavailable.