Abstract:Previous studies have shown that outcome evaluation is sensitive to social influences. However, it remains unknown whether the consistency of choice between self and others also affect the outcome evaluation. To gain more insight in this research area, we designed two experiments in the present study, in which two participants (a real participant and a confederate) completed a gambling task together. In this task, the real participant chose from two options before/after the confederate made his/her choice. The outcomes of their choices revealed after both of their choices were made. According to the choosing scenario, 2 conditions were considered in the present study for both taking the same (consistent choices) or different options (inconsistent choices). Sixteen (7 males, 20.40 ± 1.11 y) and twenty (10 males, 22.21 ± 1.70 y) healthy adults participated in the experiment 1 and 2, respectively. With normal or corrected to normal vision, none of them reported any history of neurological diseases or brain injuries. Participants were asked to perform a gambling task in collaboration with another participant. By taking turns to choose one from two covered cards, they won 50 or 0 RMB depending on their choosing consistency. In the experiment 1, the confederate chose first while in the experiment 2 the real participant chose first. After both of them made their choices and were informed with the other's choice, the outcome were revealed, which fell in 4 categories of (i) both chose the same card and both won; (ii) both chose the same option and both lost; (iii) they chose different cards and the real participant won; and (iv) they chose different cards and the real participant lost. ERP results showed that in the early stage of outcome evaluation, no matter who chose first, a more pronounced dFRN was associated with participants taking the same option than taking different options. In the later stage of outcome evaluation, only in experiment 2, increased P3 and LPP were observed when their choices were the same than different. Our data suggests that the consistency of choices between self and other does modulate the neural activity of outcome evaluation. Specifically, in the early stage, consistent choices amplified the neural response to negative outcome as indicated by the enlarged dFRN. In the later stage, when the participant made the choice first and saw the other chose a different option, this inconsistency would trigger a sense of conflict, leading to more mental processes to avoid it later. This effect reflected in the enlarged amplitudes of P3 and LPP. Our finding provides some insights into how social context influences the psychophysiological processes of outcome evaluation.

The Hierarchical Sensitivity to Social Misalignment During Decision-Making under Uncertainty

Why Can't We Accurately Predict Others' Decisions? Prediction Discrepancy in Risky Decision-Making

Hey, What is Your Choice? Uncertainty and Inconsistency Enhance Subjective Anticipation of Upcoming Information in a Social Context

Event-related Potentials and the Decision Making under Risk and Ambiguity

Prefrontal Control of Social Influence in Risk Decision Making

Riskier for Me or for Others? the Role of Domain and Probability in Self-Other Differences, in Risky Decision-Making

Distinct neural dynamics of the observed ostracism effect in decision-making under risk and ambiguity

The role of loss aversion in social conformity: psychological and neural representations

The Time Course of Neural Responses to Social Versus Non-Social Unfairness in the Ultimatum Game

High Sensation Seeking is Associated with Behavioral and Neural Insensitivity to Increased Negative Outcomes During Decision-Making under Uncertainty

P300 and Decision Making under Risk and Ambiguity

Decision-making in uncertain contexts: The role of autonomic markers in resolving indecision

Good luck or bad luck? The influence of social comparison on risk‐taking decision and the underlying neural mechanism

Different Decision-Making Responses Occupy Different Brain Networks for Information Processing: A Study Based on EEG and TMS.

The Neurocomputational Mechanism Underlying Decision-Making on Unfairness to Self and Others

Social status modulates the neural response to unfairness

Common and distinct electrophysiological correlates of feedback processing during risky and ambiguous decision making

A calculus of probability or belief? Neural underpinnings of social decision-making in a card game

Consistency of Choice Modulates Outcome Evaluation:Evidence from ERP Studies

An fMRI study on how decisions are influenced by affective evaluations from different social hierarchical positions

The Neural Pathway Linking Loss Aversion to Social Conformity