Abstract:Expectation States Theory suggests that social status carries emotions, with higher statuses producing positive emotions and lower statuses leading to negative emotions. However, the theory is broad and lacks empirical evidence. This study investigated whether positive and negative evaluations from positions of higher and lower social hierarchies affect decisions. We examined whether decision making is influenced when evaluations were given in a first (L1) versus second language (L2). Bilinguals read scenarios in which they imagined themselves in the middle of the hierarchy. They then made a series of decisions, each of which was preceded with an evaluative word from other individuals whose hierarchical positions were higher or lower. The behavioral results showed that negative evaluations from higher positions exerted greater impact on decisions than when negative evaluations came from a lower position. At the neural level, after receiving negative evaluations, a higher hierarchy elicited greater activation in the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), left supplementary motor area (SMA), right precentral gyrus, left fusiform gyrus, bilateral inferior occipital gyrus (IOG), and right AI compared to a lower hierarchy, which may be caused by the view that a negative evaluation from a higher hierarchy is criticism. Conversely, after receiving positive evaluations, the lower hierarchy elicited greater activation in the right IFG, left SMA, right precentral gyrus, bilateral IOG, right AI and right IPS compared to the higher hierarchy, which may be due to the fact that positive evaluations from positions of lower hierarchies are perceived as encouraging. Together, these findings support Expectation States Theory in that regardless of whether evaluative advice is given in an L1 or L2, there is an internal association between social status and social-emotional neural responses that are localized in the frontal–parietal and visual cortices.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper attempts to address the following issues: 1. **The impact of emotional evaluation on decision-making**: The researchers aim to explore how positive and negative emotional evaluations from different social hierarchies (high status and low status) influence individuals' decision-making processes. Specifically, they want to understand whether these emotional evaluations affect individuals' behavior during decision-making. 2. **The impact of language on decision-making**: The researchers also wish to investigate whether there are differences in the effects of these emotional evaluations when provided in the first language (L1) and the second language (L2). In particular, they want to know if language influences the impact of emotional evaluations on decision-making. ### Research Background - **Expectation States Theory** posits that social status carries emotional connotations, with high status generating positive emotions and low status leading to negative emotions. However, this theory lacks empirical support. - **Social hierarchy and emotions**: The researchers believe there is a close connection between social hierarchy and emotions. For example, when facing individuals of high status, people may feel threatened, leading to negative emotions. - **Bilingual context**: With the increase in internationalization and global communication, more and more employees in multinational companies need to receive feedback in both their first and second languages. Therefore, the researchers want to understand whether language affects the impact of emotional evaluations on decision-making. ### Research Objectives 1. **Explore the impact of emotional evaluations on decision-making**: Through behavioral and neural activity analysis, the researchers aim to verify how emotional evaluations from different social hierarchies influence individuals' decision-making. 2. **Investigate the moderating role of language**: The researchers also want to understand whether language (L1 vs. L2) moderates the effects of these emotional evaluations. ### Experimental Design - **Participants**: 26 right-handed Chinese university students, with 4 excluded due to excessive head movement during fMRI recording, resulting in 22 participants (16 females, 6 males) included in the data analysis. - **Materials**: 16 positive words and 16 negative words, presented in both Chinese and English. - **Experimental Procedure**: A 2 (Language: L1 vs. L2) × 2 (Hierarchy: High vs. Low) × 2 (Emotional Valence: Positive vs. Negative) within-subject design was used. Participants assumed they were in a middle hierarchy, receiving positive or negative evaluations from high or low-status individuals, and then made decisions. ### Main Findings - **Behavioral Results**: - **Implementation Rate**: The implementation rate under the low hierarchy condition was significantly higher than under the high hierarchy condition. The implementation rate under the positive emotional condition was significantly higher than under the negative emotional condition. After negative evaluations, the implementation rate under the low hierarchy condition was significantly higher than under the high hierarchy condition. - **Reaction Time**: Reaction time in L1 was significantly faster than in L2. Reaction time under the high hierarchy condition was significantly faster than under the low hierarchy condition. Reaction time under the positive emotional condition was significantly faster than under the negative emotional condition. - **Neural Activity**: - After negative evaluations, activation in the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), left supplementary motor area (SMA), right precentral gyrus, left fusiform gyrus, bilateral inferior occipital gyrus (IOG), and right anterior insula (AI) was significantly enhanced under the high hierarchy condition. - After positive evaluations, activation in the right IFG, left SMA, right precentral gyrus, bilateral IOG, right AI, and right intraparietal sulcus (IPS) was significantly enhanced under the low hierarchy condition. ### Conclusion - **The impact of emotional evaluations and social hierarchy on decision-making**: The research results support the Expectation States Theory, indicating an intrinsic link between social status and emotional responses, regardless of whether the emotional evaluations are given in L1 or L2. This link is mainly reflected in neural activity in the prefrontal-parietal and visual cortices. - **The moderating role of language**: The study also found that language might influence the impact of emotional evaluations on decision-making. Emotional evaluations in L1 elicited stronger neural activity and more cautious and controlled behavioral performance compared to L2. This study not only deepens our understanding of the relationship between social hierarchy and emotional processing but also reveals the rational decision-making mechanisms of bilingual individuals when facing emotional evaluations from different hierarchies.

An fMRI study on how decisions are influenced by affective evaluations from different social hierarchical positions