Abstract:Ecological MonographsVolume 80, Issue 4 p. 569-608 Article High-dimensional coexistence based on individual variation: a synthesis of evidence James S. Clark, Corresponding Author James S. Clark jimclark@duke.edu Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USA Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USA Department of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USA E-mail: jimclark@duke.eduSearch for more papers by this authorDavid Bell, David Bell Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USASearch for more papers by this authorChengjin Chu, Chengjin Chu Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USASearch for more papers by this authorBenoit Courbaud, Benoit Courbaud Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USASearch for more papers by this authorMichael Dietze, Michael Dietze Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USASearch for more papers by this authorMichelle Hersh, Michelle Hersh Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USA Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USASearch for more papers by this authorJanneke HilleRisLambers, Janneke HilleRisLambers Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USASearch for more papers by this authorInés Ibášez, Inés Ibášez Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USASearch for more papers by this authorShannon LaDeau, Shannon LaDeau Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Milbrook, New York 12545 USASearch for more papers by this authorSean McMahon, Sean McMahon Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USASearch for more papers by this authorJessica Metcalf, Jessica Metcalf Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USASearch for more papers by this authorJacqueline Mohan, Jacqueline Mohan Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USASearch for more papers by this authorEmily Moran, Emily Moran Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USA Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USASearch for more papers by this authorLuke Pangle, Luke Pangle Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USASearch for more papers by this authorScott Pearson, Scott Pearson Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USASearch for more papers by this authorCarl Salk, Carl Salk Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USA Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USASearch for more papers by this authorZehao Shen, Zehao Shen Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USASearch for more papers by this authorDenis Valle, Denis Valle Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USASearch for more papers by this authorPeter Wyckoff, Peter Wyckoff Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USASearch for more papers by this author James S. Clark, Corresponding Author James S. Clark jimclark@duke.edu Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USA Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USA Department of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USA E-mail: jimclark@duke.eduSearch for more papers by this authorDavid Bell, David Bell Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USASearch for more papers by this authorChengjin Chu, Chengjin Chu Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USASearch for more papers by this authorBenoit Courbaud, Benoit Courbaud Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USASearch for more papers by this authorMichael Dietze, Michael Dietze Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USASearch for more papers by this authorMichelle Hersh, Michelle Hersh Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USA Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USASearch for more papers by this authorJanneke HilleRisLambers, Janneke HilleRisLambers Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USASearch for more papers by this authorInés Ibášez, Inés Ibášez Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USASearch for more papers by this authorShannon LaDeau, Shannon LaDeau Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Milbrook, New York 12545 USASearch for more papers by this authorSean McMahon, Sean McMahon Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USASearch for more papers by this authorJessica Metcalf, Jessica Metcalf Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USASearch for more papers by this authorJacqueline Mohan, Jacqueline Mohan Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USASearch for more papers by this authorEmily Moran, Emily Moran Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USA Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USASearch for more papers by this authorLuke Pangle, Luke Pangle Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USASearch for more papers by this authorScott Pearson, Scott Pearson Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USASearch for more papers by this authorCarl Salk, Carl Salk Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USA Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USASearch for more papers by this authorZehao Shen, Zehao Shen Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USASearch for more papers by this authorDenis Valle, Denis Valle Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USASearch for more papers by this authorPeter Wyckoff, Peter Wyckoff Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 USASearch for more papers by this author First published: 01 November 2010 https://doi.org/10.1890/09-1541.1Citations: 117 Corresponding Editor: A. M. Ellison. Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat Abstract High biodiversity of forests is not predicted by traditional models, and evidence for trade-offs those models require is limited. High-dimensional regulation (e.g., N factors to regulate N species) has long been recognized as a possible alternative explanation, but it has not be been seriously pursued, because only a few limiting resources are evident for trees, and analysis of multiple interactions is challenging. We develop a hierarchical model that allows us to synthesize data from long-term, experimental, data sets with processes that control growth, maturation, fecundity, and survival. We allow for uncertainty at all stages and variation among 26 000 individuals and over time, including 268 000 tree years, for dozens of tree species. We estimate population-level parameters that apply at the species level and the interactions among latent states, i.e., the demographic rates for each individual, every year. The former show that the traditional trade-offs used to explain diversity are not present. Demographic rates overlap among species, and they do not show trends consistent with maintenance of diversity by simple mechanisms (negative correlations and limiting similarity). However, estimates of latent states at the level of individuals and years demonstrate that species partition environmental variation. Correlations between responses to variation in time are high for individuals of the same species, but not for individuals of different species. We demonstrate that these relationships are pervasive, providing strong evidence that high-dimensional regulation is critical for biodiversity regulation. Citing Literature Supporting Information Filename Description https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3309576 Research data pertaining to this article is located at figshare.com: Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. Volume80, Issue4November 2010Pages 569-608 RelatedInformation

Loss of Top Predators and Fragmentation Lead to the Decline of Dominant Plants in Forests: a Balance Needed for Conservation and Management on Overabundant Large Herbivore Species.

Impacts of Top Predators and Humans on the Mammal Communities of Recovering Temperate Forest Regions.

Herbivory limits success of vegetation restoration globally

Afforestation falls short as a biodiversity strategy

Rewilding herbivores: too much or little of a good thing?

Large mammals and trees in eastern monsoonal China: anthropogenic losses since the Late Pleistocene and restoration prospects in the Anthropocene

Biodiversity loss impacts top-down regulation of insect herbivores across ecosystem boundaries

Directed species loss reduces community productivity in a subtropical forest biodiversity experiment

Habitat loss weakens the positive relationship between grassland plant richness and above-ground biomass

How to promote terrestrial herbivores' conservation in areas where small-scale agriculturalists set up fences − An analysis based on evolutionary game theory

HIGH DIMENSIONAL COEXISTENCE BASED ON INDIVIDUAL VARIATION: A SYNTHESIS OF EVIDENCE

The loss of plant functional groups increased arthropod diversity in an alpine meadow on the Tibetan Plateau

Contrasting Responses of Plant Herbivory and Disease to Local and Landscape Drivers

An unprotected vulnerable relict subtropical conifer- Keteleeria evelyniana: Its forests, populations, growth and endangerment by invasive alien plant species in China

Density‐dependent dispersal strategy of pollinator moderates the adverse effect of habitat loss on plant reproduction: An integrated model based on pollinators' behavioral response

Landscape simplification filters species traits and drives biotic homogenization

Abundance Versus Vital Rates: the Extent and Predictors of Inconsistent Conclusions on Avian Population Responses to Forest Loss and Degradation

A rodent herbivore reduces its predation risk through ecosystem engineering

Landscape fragmentation overturns classical metapopulation thinking

Experimental loss of generalist plants reveals alterations in plant-pollinator interactions and a constrained flexibility of foraging

Forest edges increase pollinator network robustness to extinction with declining area