Abundance Versus Vital Rates: the Extent and Predictors of Inconsistent Conclusions on Avian Population Responses to Forest Loss and Degradation

Yuan Tian,Fangyuan Hua

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110353

IF: 7.499

2023-01-01

Biological Conservation

Abstract:Understanding how forest loss and degradation impact species populations is a key conservation inquiry. To date, our knowledge of such impacts is predominantly based on measuring "snapshot" abundance responses, which may not reflect long-term population trajectories and risk spurious conclusions. Averting this risk necessitates understanding to what extent and under what conditions abundance metrics may draw inconsistent conclusions with population vital rates, yet such an assessment remains lacking. In this study, we fill this knowledge gap using a systematic literature review, focusing on birds as the study taxon. We searched for published empirical studies that simultaneously measured species' abundance and vital rate responses to forest loss or degradation. We then assessed the level of consistency in conclusions between these two metric types and possible predictors. We identified 48 studies that together reported 163 paired findings based on abundance and vital rate metrics ("cases"), involving 59 species from 12 countries, mostly in North America. We found that in 36.8 % of these cases, findings were inconsistent between the two metric types. We further found that the more recent forest loss or degradation was relative to the time of study, the more likely findings were inconsistent between abundance and vital rates. Our study highlights the caution needed in using abundance to measure population responses to forest loss and degradation, and the necessity to directly measure vital rates whenever possible, particularly when forest loss and degradation are recent.