Abstract:These findings demonstrate that among a diverse prey guild within a spatially heterogeneous environment, asymmetrical predation between a primary and secondary prey species can modulate both the magnitude of perceived risk and the strategies used to manage it, highlighting an important and understudied contingency in risk effects research. It is widely recognized that predators can influence prey through both direct consumption and by inducing costly antipredator behaviours, the latter of which can produce nonconsumptive effects that cascade through trophic systems. Yet, determining how particular prey manage risk in natural settings remains challenging as empirical studies disproportionately focus on single predator–prey dyads. Here, we contrast foraging strategies within the context of a primary and secondary prey to explore how antipredator behaviours emerge as a product of predation intensity as well as the setting in which an encounter takes place. We studied the effects of spotted owls (Strix occidentalis) on two species experiencing asymmetrical risk: dusky‐footed woodrats (Neotoma fuscipes; primary prey) and deer mice (Peromyscus spp.; alternative prey). Woodrats are most abundant within young forests, but predominantly captured by owls foraging within mature forests; in contrast, deer mice occur in high densities across forest types and seral stages and are consumed at lower per‐capita rates overall. We deployed experimental foraging patches within areas of high and low spotted owl activity, created artificial risky and safe refuge treatments, and monitored behaviour throughout the entirety of prey foraging bouts. Woodrats were more vigilant and foraged less within mature forests and at riskier patches, although the effect of refuge treatment was contingent upon forest type. In contrast, deer mice only demonstrated consistent behavioural responses to riskier refuge treatments; forest type had little effect on perceived risk or the relative importance of refuge treatment. Thus, habitat can interact with predator activity to structure antipredator responses differently for primary versus secondary prey. Our findings show that asymmetrical predation can modulate both the magnitude of perceived risk and the strategies used to manage it, thus highlighting an important and understudied contingency in risk effects research. Evaluating the direct and indirect effects of predation through the paradigm of primary and secondary prey may improve our understanding of how nonconsumptive effects can extend to population‐ and community‐level responses.

A rodent herbivore reduces its predation risk through ecosystem engineering

Rodent Abundance Triggered Switch Between the Relative Mutualism and Predation in a Rodent-Seed System of the Subtropical Island Forest.

Invasive mammals and habitat modification interact to generate unforeseen outcomes for indigenous fauna

Asymmetrical predation intensity produces divergent antipredator behaviours in primary and secondary prey

Proactive cursorial and ambush predation risk avoidance in four African herbivore species

Mesopredator suppression by an apex predator alleviates the risk of predation perceived by small prey

Predation risk modifies habitat use and habitat selection of diving beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) in an Urban Pondscape

Landscape composition mediates the relationship between predator body size and pest control

A reciprocal transplant approach to predation in fouling communities found in natural and artificial habitats

Trophic cascades regulate arthropods density and plant damage across forest strata

Biological pest regulation can benefit from diverse predation modes

Predator-induced prey dispersal can cause hump-shaped density-area relationships in prey populations

Too Risky to Settle: Avian Community Structure Changes in Response to Perceived Predation Risk on Adults and Offspring

Top-down effects of intraspeciflic predator behavioral variation

Predator–prey interactions across hunting mode, spatial domain size, and habitat complexities

Local Habitat Complexity and Its Effects on Herbivores and Predators in Urban Agroecosystems

The Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Insect Predator–Prey System Incorporating Refuge Effect

Plant structural complexity and mechanical defenses mediate predator-prey interactions in an odonate-bird system

Linking predation risk, herbivore physiological stress and microbial decomposition of plant litter

Mesopredators have differing influences on prey habitat use and diel activity in a multipredator landscape

Predatory Beetles Facilitate Plant Growth by Driving Earthworms to Lower Soil Layers