Effectiveness of different resuscitation methods for severe uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock in a dog model

Shan Jiang,Shaoming He,Yang Sun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v18i11.23
2019-01-01
Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research
Abstract:Purpose: To compare the effects of pituitrin resuscitation, hypertonic saline resuscitation and limited fluid resuscitation on a novel dog model of severe uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock (UCHS). Methods: Severe UCHS was produced in healthy Chinese dogs (n = 24) using a standard method. The hemorrhaged dogs were randomly divided into three groups of 8 dogs each: vasopressin group (group A), hypertonic saline group (group B), and low-volume fluid resuscitation group (group C). Group A received pituitrin at an initial dose of 0.1U/kg intravenously, which was thereafter reduced to 0.04 U/kg/min. Group B dogs received 7.5 % hypertonic saline (6 mL/kg), while dogs in group C were treated with 6 % hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 200/0.5. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) of the dogs was maintained between 50 and 55 mmHg, and after 1 h, full-volume resuscitation was administered. Hemodynamic parameters, blood gas, levels of inflammatory factors and blood loss were assessed at different time points. Results: Compared with group A, hemodynamic parameters in group B were higher; hematocrit of group B was lower; IL-10 of groups B and C were reduced, but TNF-alpha, TNF-alpha/IL-10 and ACTH were elevated (p < 0.05). Relative to group C, base deficits in groups A and B were low. During uncontrolled hemorrhage phase, blood loss in group B was higher than that in other groups (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The results obtained in this study suggest that pituitrin resuscitation produces relatively optimal effect through effective maintenance of coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) and reduction of inflammatory responses.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?