Comparison of three different resuscitation strategies on severe uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock in dogs

CHEN Ming-fu,ZHONG Bing,HE Shao-ming,LIU Ying-na,ZHANG Gan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2013.14.061
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the effects of delayed resuscitation, hypotensive fluid resuscitation and pituitrin resuscitation on severe uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock(UHS) in dogs at early stage. Methods Severe UHS was produced by exsanguinating hemorrhage from femoral artery in 24 healthy dogs which were randomized into 3 groups(n=8)according to resuscitation strategies after MAP about 50 mm Hg. None resuscitation measure was given in group A(delayed resuscitation), a small quantity of hydroxyethyl starch(HES200/0.5) and pituitrin(0.1-0.4 U/kg) was given via vein in group B and group C respectively to maintain goal blood pressure(50 mm Hg). After 1 h, exsanguination was stopped and full volume resuscitation was given. Hemodynamics index, blood gas analysis, TNF-α and IL-10 were monitored at T0(before exsanguinating), T1(the time for the goal blood pressure achieved), T2(1 h after T1) and T3(2 h after T2). Blood loss and survival to 72 hours were observed. The samples of heart, kidney and lung were taken for pathology test when the dogs died or were killed immediately after 72 h. Results(1)Hemodynamics: Compared with group B and group C, the SBP, DBP, MAP, CVP and HR of group A were significantly lower at T2(P<0.05), and most of the dogs(6/8) died.(2) Inflammatory medium and blood gas analysis: The BD, BL and SvO2 of the three groups were significantly difference from T0 at T1 and T2(P<0.01), but the SvO2 was normal at T3 in spite of the BD and BL were still high. The changes of TNF-α and IL-10 were the same as the BD and BL, but which of group A was significantly difference from group B and group C at T2 and T3(P<0.05).(3) Blood loss and survival rate: During uncontrolled blood loss, blood loss in group A was lower than that of group B(P<0.05), but here was no significant difference between group A and group C. The survival rates of 72 h in group A(25%) was significantly lower than that of group B(87.5%) and group C(100%)(P<0.01).(4)Pathology test: The pathological lesions of heart, kidney and lung in group A were more serious than that of group B and group C, but the lesion of group C was lighter than that of group B. Conclusion On severe uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock, both hypotensive fluid resuscitation and pituitrin resuscitation are effective at early stage, but the blood loss and organizational lesion of hypotensive fluid resuscitation are significantly more serious than that of pituitrin resuscitation, and delayed resuscitation is inadvisable.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?