Effects of Three Fluid Resuscitation Methods on Apoptosis of Visceral Organs in Rats with Hemorrhagic Shock

Lu Yuan-qiang,Cai Xiu-jun,Gu Lin-hui,Fan Yu-jing,Wang Qi,Bao De-guo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02841002
2005-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To observe the effects of three fluid resuscitation methods on apoptosis of visceral organs in rats withhemorrhagic shock. Methods: A model of rat with severe hemorrhagic shock and active bleeding was established in 32 SD(Sprague-Dawley) rats. The rats were randomly divided into control group, no fluid resuscitation group (NF group), controlledfluid resuscitation group (NS40 group) and rapid large scale fluid resuscitation group (NS80 group). Each group contained 8 rats.The curative effects were compared. At the same time, the apoptosis in liver, kidney, lung and small intestinal mucosa of survivorsafter hemorrhage and resuscitation was detected by light microscopy in HE (hematoxylin and eosin) stained tissue sections, flowcytometry and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL). Results: The survival rate of early fluidresuscitation (14/16) was markedly higher than that of NF group (3/8). There was some apoptosis in liver, kidney, lung and smallintestinal mucosa of all survivors. Compared with NF and NS40 groups, the apoptosis of liver, kidney and small intestinal mucosaof NS80 group was obviously increased. Conclusions: Among three fluid resuscitation methods, controlled fluid resuscitation canobviously improve the early survival rate and the apoptosis of liver, kidney and small intestinal mucosa in rats with severe anduncontrolled hemorrhagic shock, and may benefit improvement of prognosis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?