Abstract:Dual-process approaches of decision-making examine the interaction between affective/intuitive and deliberative processes underlying value judgment. From this perspective, decisions are supported by a combination of relatively explicit capabilities for abstract reasoning and relatively implicit evolved domain-general as well as learned domain-specific affective responses. One such approach, the somatic markers hypothesis (SMH), expresses these implicit processes as a system of evolved primary emotions supplemented by associations between affect and experience that accrue over lifetime, or somatic markers. In this view, somatic markers are useful only if their local capability to predict the value of an action is above a baseline equal to the predictive capability of the combined rational and primary emotional subsystems. We argue that decision-making has often been conceived of as a linear process: the effect of decision sequences is additive, local utility is cumulative, and there is no strong environmental feedback. This widespread assumption can have consequences for answering questions regarding the relative weight between the systems and their interaction within a cognitive architecture. We introduce a mathematical formalization of the SMH and study it in situations of dynamic, non-linear decision chains using a discrete-time stochastic model. We find, contrary to expectations, that decision-making events can interact non-additively with the environment in apparently paradoxical ways. We find that in non-lethal situations, primary emotions are represented globally over and above their local weight, showing a tendency for overcautiousness in situated decision chains. We also show that because they tend to counteract this trend, poorly attuned somatic markers that by themselves do not locally enhance decision-making, can still produce an overall positive effect. This result has developmental and evolutionary implications since, by promoting exploratory behavior, somatic markers would seem to be beneficial even at early stages when experiential attunement is poor. Although the model is formulated in terms of the SMH, the implications apply to dual systems theories in general since it makes minimal assumptions about the nature of the processes involved.

Emotion and Reasoning in Human Decision-Making

Neural Mechanisms of Human Decision-Making

Reward and decision processes in the brains of humans and nonhuman primates

The Neural Correlates of Decision-Making: Review and Research Agenda

Brain Mechanisms of Emotion and Decision-Making

Decision making in Economics -- a behavioral approach

Towards Decision-Making Theories:the Interface of Neuroscience and Economics

Cooperative versus competitive influences of emotion and cognition on decision making: A primer for psychiatry research

Reasoning, Learning, and Creativity: Frontal Lobe Function and Human Decision-Making

Is a bird in the hand worth two in the future? The neuroeconomics of intertemporal decision-making

Decision Making Under Objective Risk Conditions–a Review of Cognitive and Emotional Correlates, Strategies, Feedback Processing, and External Influences

The neural substrates of probabilistic and intertemporal decision making

Brain Mechanisms for Perceptual and Reward-Related Decision-Making

Passionate rationalism: the role of emotion in decision making

Neural and Computational Mechanisms of Motivation and Decision-making

Rational inattention in neural coding for economic choice

Policy consequences of the new neuroeconomic framework

Noise In The Brain, Decision-Making, Determinism, Free Will, And Consciousness

The description-experience gap: a challenge for the neuroeconomics of decision-making under uncertainty

Unreliable Gut Feelings Can Lead to Correct Decisions: The Somatic Marker Hypothesis in Non-Linear Decision Chains

Neural Mechanisms of Social Learning and Decision-Making