An Inquiry into the Xunzian Moral Motivation

Kai Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-2030.2019.01.002
2018-01-01
Abstract:The existing research on Xunzi's moral subject mostly emphasizes the agent's cognitive ability, the dimension of intellectuality. However, if the agent does not have the inherent demand for morality, pure intellectuality alone cannot not make ritual internalization. It should be noted that the need for morality differs from the need for food, and "that which one does not have within oneself, one is sure to seek for outside" is not enough to explain the internal motivation of moral self-improvement. This predicament highlights the limitations of Kantian moral subject and calls for the search for the third dimension of moral motivation beyond reason and sensibility. The so-called third dimension, which corresponds to Wertfuhlen in Scheler's value ethics, corresponds to compassion (ceyin ) in Mengzi's ethics and to the feeling of empathy in Xunzi's ethics. For Xunzi, "among all the living things between Heaven and Earth, those that have blood and qi are to have zhi." This zhi refers not only to the general sense of awareness or perception, but also to the psychological ability of mutual interpersonal empathy among human beings. "Among all the creatures that have blood and qi, none has greater zhi Au than human", therefore the intense empathy enables human to break through the selfish and narrow patriarchal feelings, to feel with all its kind, so as to develop universal empathy. Needless to say, this is exactly the moral basis for the possible existence. On the other hand, although Xunzi takes empathy as moral motivation, Xunzi's concept of moral agent still fundamentally differs from Mengzi's in two aspects. First, the emotion of "love one's own kind" based on the zhi Au of blood-qi has its own character of naturalness. In short, this emotion does not necessarily lead to moral values. That is the reason that Xunzi proposes "dwells in ren by means of yi and insists that the natural emotion of "love its kind" can be taken as the true moral emotion only when it reaches the rational consciousness through the agent's self-reflection. Second, based on the ontological basis of human empathy, mankind has the mental consciousness of how individuals should get along with each other whereas its content comes from acquired learning instead. Therefore, these different understanding of the moral agent correspondingly leads to two different ways of self-cultivation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?