Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To explore the impact of measurement error on the associated effects under the incorrectly-measured variables when mixed with precisely measured variables.METHODS:Based on the functions of measurement error, correlation of incorrectly-measured predictors and precisely measured explanatory variables, number of precisely measured explanatory variables and associated effect, the 'R Project for Statistical Computing' method is used to analyze the impact of measurement on the validity of a study.RESULTS:Under the scenario that the continuous response Y and the continuous explanatory Z are precisely measured but the continuous predictor X is incorrectly-measured, when focusing on inference about the effect of X on Y, the non-differential measurement error always makes the value of estimated effect less than the actual value, and the attenuation effect of measurement error more closely worsens the correlation of X and Z. Under a misclassification dichotomous predictor X with an additional precisely measured explanatory variable Z and focusing on inference about the effect of X on Y, the misclassification bias is not only related to the sensitivity and specificity of exposure measurement, but also to the correlation between X and Z and exposure proportion of X. The attenuation factor (AF) decreases gradually with the increasing correlation between X and Z. For instance, in the p = 0.5 scenario, AF is 1.419, and the estimated effect of dichotomous predictor X on continuous response Y is more than the actual effect. When it increases to 0.9, AF is 0.474, the estimated effect becomes less than the true effect.CONCLUSION:In the studies of the impact of measurement error in linear regression with additional precisely measured explanatory variables, the impact of measurement error on the associated effect is relatively complex, suggesting that it is necessary to control and to assess the measurement error bias in order to correctly interpret the results of a study.

Measurement bias: a structure perspective

The directionality of measurement bias: a directed acyclic graph-based structural perspective

Bias in multivariable Mendelian randomization studies due to measurement error on exposures

Measurement error and information bias in causal diagrams: mapping epidemiological concepts and graphical structures

Causal complexity and psychological measurement

Robust Bayesian Inference for Berkson and Classical Measurement Error Models

Familial confounding or measurement error? How to interpret findings from sibling and co-twin control studies

To Adjust or Not to Adjust? Sensitivity Analysis of M-Bias and Butterfly-Bias

Anchored Causal Inference in the Presence of Measurement Error

The Impact of Incorrectly-Measured Variables when Mixed with Precisely Measured Variables on the Study of Validity in Epidemiological Research

Causal Inference and Related Statistical Methods

Measurement Error as a Missing Data Problem

Advances in meta‐analysis: A unifying modelling framework with measurement error correction

Measurement Error-Robust Causal Inference via Constructed Instrumental Variables

Everything that can be learned about a causal structure with latent variables by observational and interventional probing schemes

The Combined Effects of Measurement Error and Omitting Confounders in the Single-Mediator Model

Bayesian Structured Mediation Analysis With Unobserved Confounders

Modeling complex measurement error in microbiome experiments

Learning Models from Data with Measurement Error: Tackling Underreporting

Causal Inference with Double/Debiased Machine Learning for Evaluating the Health Effects of Multiple Mismeasured Pollutants

Detecting and Measuring Confounding Using Causal Mechanism Shifts