Causal complexity and psychological measurement

Markus Ilkka Eronen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2023.2300693

2024-01-04

Philosophical Psychology

Abstract:Psychological measurement has received strong criticism throughout the history of psychological science. Nevertheless, measurements of attributes such as emotions or intelligence continue to be widely used in research and society. I address this puzzle by presenting a new causal perspective to psychological measurement. I start with assumptions that both critics and proponents of psychological measurement are likely to accept: a minimal causal condition and the observation that most psychological concepts are ill-defined or ambiguous. Based on this, I argue that psychological measurement is fundamentally different from measurement in the physical sciences but can nevertheless be useful.

psychology, multidisciplinary,ethics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### The Problem the Paper Attempts to Address

This paper attempts to explore the issue of the validity of psychometrics and proposes a new causal perspective to explain the practical value of psychometrics.

#### Overview
Author Markus Ilkka Eronen argues that although psychometrics (such as the measurement of attributes like emotions, well-being, or intelligence) are widely used in scientific research and society, their validity and rationality have always been criticized. This paper proposes a minimal causal condition to re-examine psychometrics and discusses how the vagueness of psychological concepts and the complexity of the mind-brain system affect the validity of measurements.

#### Main Points
1. **Minimal Causal Condition**:
- The validity of psychometrics requires that the measurement results must be caused by the attribute being measured.
- Although this condition is weak, it poses a fundamental challenge to psychometrics.

2. **Vagueness of Psychological Concepts**:
- Most psychological concepts (such as symptoms, emotions, attention, etc.) are not clearly defined, making it difficult to determine the actual causal structure of these concepts.
- For example, "impaired attention" may encompass various different phenomena, which do not have the same causal relationships.

3. **Complexity of the Mind-Brain System**:
- The human brain is extremely complex, and existing psychometric models are often overly simplified, failing to accurately reflect the actual causal structure.
- This complexity makes it unreasonable to assume that current psychometrics meet the minimal causal condition.

#### Conclusions and Recommendations
- Although psychometrics cannot be regarded as "hard measurements" in the strict sense, they can still have practical value in specific contexts.
- The author proposes the concept of "soft measurement," distinguishing between precise measurements in physical sciences and the data generation process in psychology.
- The concept of soft measurement helps to advance the discussion in the field of psychometrics and emphasizes the need to further understand the characteristics of soft measurement and its significance in practical applications.

Through this new perspective, the author hopes to provide a more reasonable and practical framework for understanding psychometrics.