Abstract:Mendelian randomization is the use of genetic variants to make causal inferences from observational data. The field is currently undergoing a revolution fuelled by increasing numbers of genetic variants demonstrated to be associated with exposures in genome-wide association studies, and the public availability of summarized data on genetic associations with exposures and outcomes from large consortia. A Mendelian randomization analysis with many genetic variants can be performed relatively simply using summarized data. However, a causal interpretation is only assured if each genetic variant satisfies the assumptions of an instrumental variable. To provide some protection against failure of these assumptions, robust methods for instrumental variable analysis have been proposed. Here, we develop three extensions to instrumental variable methods using: i) robust regression, ii) the penalization of weights from candidate instruments with heterogeneous causal estimates, and iii) L1 penalization. Results from a wide variety of robust methods, including the recently-proposed MR-Egger and median-based methods, are compared in an extensive simulation study. We demonstrate that two methods, robust regression in an inverse-variance weighted method and a simple median of the causal estimates from the individual variants, have considerably improved Type 1 error rates compared with conventional methods in a wide variety of scenarios when up to 30% of the genetic variants are invalid instruments. While the MR-Egger method gives unbiased estimates when its assumptions are satisfied, these estimates are less efficient than those from other methods and are highly sensitive to violations of the assumptions. Methods that make different assumptions should be used routinely to assess the robustness of findings from applied Mendelian randomization investigations with multiple genetic variants.

Measurement Error-Robust Causal Inference via Constructed Instrumental Variables

Robust Bayesian Inference for Berkson and Classical Measurement Error Models

Instrumental Variables Estimation with Some Invalid Instruments and its Application to Mendelian Randomization

Robust causal inference with continuous instruments using the local instrumental variable curve

Learning Models from Data with Measurement Error: Tackling Underreporting

Semiparametric transformation Model with measurement error in Covariates: An Instrumental variable approach

Using an Instrumental Variable to Test for Unmeasured Confounding

Control Function Instrumental Variable Estimation of Nonlinear Causal Effect Models

Mendelian Randomization when Many Instruments are Invalid: Hierarchical Empirical Bayes Estimation

Valid Causal Inference with (Some) Invalid Instruments

Familial confounding or measurement error? How to interpret findings from sibling and co-twin control studies

Measurement Error as a Missing Data Problem

Non‐classical measurement error in instrumental variables estimation: An application to the medical care costs of obesity

Two Robust Tools for Inference about Causal Effects with Invalid Instruments

Bias in multivariable Mendelian randomization studies due to measurement error on exposures

Measurement Error in Nutritional Epidemiology: A Survey

Measurement error in two-stage analyses, with application to air pollution epidemiology

Identifying Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables from the Auxiliary Dataset

Selective Machine Learning of the Average Treatment Effect with an Invalid Instrumental Variable

Achieving Reliable Causal Inference with Data-Mined Variables: A Random Forest Approach to the Measurement Error Problem

Robust instrumental variable methods using multiple candidate instruments with application to Mendelian randomization